Authors:

Ignasia G.M. Rada, Ni Wayan Febriana Utami, I Nyoman Gede Astawa

Abstract:

“Evaluation of aesthetic value and humadity index of Lumintang city park Denpasar. This research isbased on the needs of the people on recreation area that meets aesthetic and comfortness aspects inaccordance with the standards of a city park. Aesthetic is considered as important as a means of supportingthe beauty of the city and framed the landscape to soften the stiff impression of the city buildings, beside thathumadity is considered important as an effort to improve the microclimate of the city so that the communitymore comfortable to indulge in and around the public park. This study aims to evaluate the two main aspectsin Lumintang city park which meet the psychological needs of the community by using indicators of aestheticand comfort assessment of Scenic Beauty Estimation (SBE) and Thermal Humadity Index (THI). The method was field survey with observation technique to determine the value of temperature and humidity alsoquestionnaires technique to determine the value of SBE and the preception dan preferences of visitors. Theresult of data analysis showed that the value of aesthetic in Lumintang city park belong to moderate category.The lowest value located in the easthern area which wasfountain and the highest value was located in theeastern area which wasparking lot. The comfortness index showed that Lumintang city park was belong tocomfort with the most comfortable area located in southern area which was a sport area (25,10). Inconclusion, the environmental enhancement necessary in order to evaluate the aesthetic value and humadityindex to be a better condition for the user and meet the two aspects in a green open space.”

Keywords

Keyword Not Available

Downloads:

Download data is not yet available.

References

  • Budiyono, D. (2015). Evaluasi Estetika Lingkungan Berdasarkan Persepsi Welcome Area Kampus Institut Pertanian Bogor. Buana Sains. Volume 15 No 1, pp. 19-28.
  • Gunawan, A. (2005). Evaluasi Kualitas Estetika Lanskap Kota Bogor. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia. Volume 1, pp. 77-80.
  • Kant, I. (1951). Critique of Judgment. New York: Hafner Press
  • Mayangsari, R. (2012). Evaluasi Keindahan, Kenyamanan dan Fungsi Taman Publik Kota Surabaya (Studi Kasus: Taman Bugkul). Jurnal Hortikultura. Volume 5(5), pp. 39-43.
  • Novitasari, H. (2010). Pendugaan Keindahan RTH Kota Malang dengan Metode Scenic Beauty Estiation. Jurnal Penelitian Hortikultura. Volume 17(4), pp. 20-28.
  • Ridwan, W. (2011). Analisis Perubahan Tingkat Kenyamanan Kota Malang. Jurnal Agrisistem, Volume 4(1&2), pp. 107-111.
  • Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2007). Undang-Undang No. 26 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penataan Ruang Pasa1 29 Ayat 1-3
  • Yanti, C. W. B. (2015). Evaluasi Nilai Fungsional dan Estetika Taman Maccini Sombala. Jurnal Arsitektur Lansekap Vol 1. No 2. Pp 50-57.
  • Utoyo, B. (2009). Geografi 1 Membuka Cakrawala Dunia. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

PDF:

https://jurnal.harianregional.com/lanskap/full-54151

Published

2019-10-31

How To Cite

RADA, Ignasia G.M.; UTAMI, Ni Wayan Febriana; ASTAWA, I Nyoman Gede. Evaluasi nilai keindahan dan indeks kenyamanan taman kota Lumintang Denpasar.Jurnal Arsitektur Lansekap, [S.l.], p. 150-159, oct. 2019. ISSN 2442-5508. Available at: https://jurnal.harianregional.com/lanskap/id-54151. Date accessed: 28 Aug. 2025. doi:https://doi.org/10.24843/JAL.2019.v05.i02.p02.

Citation Format

ABNT, APA, BibTeX, CBE, EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows), MLA, ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows), RefWorks, Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only), Turabian

Issue

Vol.5, No.2, Oktober 2019

Section

Articles

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License