Authors:

I Made Halmadiningrat, Violla Reininda Hafidz

Abstract:

“The discrepancy between Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVII/2020 on the review of the Job Creation Law and the PERPPU on Job Creation has created constitutional incompatibilities. The research aims to analyze the executorial power in the final and recall nature of the Constitutional Court’s decision on the follow-up of the Constitutional Court’s decision by the legislators and (ii) the implementation of the constitutional mandate of Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 on Job Creation in the Job Creation PERPPU in the dynamics of the relationship between the Constitutional Court and the legislators. This research uses a combination of normative-doctrinal methods using a contextual approach, legislative approach, conceptual approach and case approach. The results of this study indicate that the Constitutional Court’s decision has executorial power over the final and binding nature erga omnes. The Constitutional Court’s conditional unconstitutional decision regarding the formal examination of the Job Creation Law has shifted the role of the Constitutional Court as a positive legislature which also results in the nature of the Constitutional Court’s decision as a quasi-law. Follow-up of the Constitutional Court’s decision is also considered important as compliance with the constitution. This research also shows that there is a mismatch between the constitutional mandate in Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVII/2020 and the follow-up carried out by the President as one of the branches of lawmaking power. This mismatch is clearly a form of constitutional delegitimization and straddles the final and binding Constitutional Court decision.”

Keywords

Keyword Not Available

Downloads:

Download data is not yet available.

References

  • Buku
  • Albo, G., & Fanelli, C. (2015). Penghematan Melawan Demokrasi: Fase Otoriter Neoliberalisme.
  • Jakarta: Indoprogress
  • Apeldoorn, A. (2017). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita
  • Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press
  • ____. (2010). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Konpress
  • Benda, E. (2005). Pelaksanaan Keputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi di Negara-Negara Transformasi
  • dengan Contoh Indonesia. Jakarta: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung
  • Brewer-Carías, A. (2011). Constitutional Courts as Positive Legislators: A Comparative Law
  • Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Butt, S. (2015). The Constitutional Court and Democracy in Indonesia. Leiden: Brill
  • Fallon, Jr, R.H. (2001). Implementing The Constitution. Cambridge: Harvard University
  • Ginsburg, T. (2003). Judicial Review in New Democracies, Constitutional Court in Asian Cases.
  • Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Hamilton, A. (2008). “The Federalist Paper” dalam Maruarar Siahaan, Undang-Undang
  • Dasar 1945 Konstitusi Yang Hidup.Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan
  • Mahkamah Konstitusi
  • Harahap, Y. (1997). Beberapa Tinjauan Mengenai Sistem Peradilan & Penyelesaian Sengketa.
  • Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti
  • Harman, B.K. Peranan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Mewujudkan Reformasi Hukum,
  • dalam Harun, R., Husein, Z.A.M., & Bisariyadi (eds). (2004). Menjaga Denyut
  • Konstitusi: Reflexi satu tahun Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press
  • Hartono, D. dalam Tim Penyusun. (2010). Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang
  • Dasar 1945: Latar Belakang, Proses, dan Hasil Pembahasan 1999-2002. Jakarta:
  • Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi
  • Hendrianto, S. (2018). Law and Politics of Constitutional Court: Indonesia and the Search for
  • Judicial Heroes. New York: Routledge
  • Hirschl, R. (2014). Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law.
  • Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Horowitz, D.L. (2013). Constitutional Change and Democracy in Indonesia. New York:
  • Cambridge University Press
  • Huda, N. (2012). Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
  • Huijbers, T. (1982). Filsafat Hukum Dalam Lintas Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Kansius
  • Ifani, I., & Hasani, I. (2018). Laporan Kinerja Mahkamah Konstitusi 2015-2016: Mendorong
  • Kepatuhan Lembaga Negara Pada Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Pustaka
  • Masyarakat
  • Martitah. (2013). Mahkamah Konstitusi: Dari Negative Legislature ke Positive Legislature.
  • Jakarta: Konstitusi Press
  • MD, M.M. (2013). Problematika Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Bersifat Positive
  • Legislature, dalam Martitah, Mahkamah Konstitusi Dari Negative Legislature ke
  • Positive Legislature. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press
  • Ibrahim, J. (2007). Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia
  • Publishing
  • Isra, S. (2010). Pergeseran Fungsi Legislasi: Menguatnya Model Legislasi Parlementer Dalam
  • Sistem Presidensial Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
  • Kelsen, H. (1973). General Theory of Law and State. New York: Russel & Russel
  • Kusuma, R.M.A.B. (2011). Sistem Pemerintahan “Pendiri Negara” Versus Sistem Presidensial
  • “Orde Baru”, Jakarta: FH UI
  • Rohdewohld, R. (1995). Public Administration in Indonesia. Melbourne: Montech Pty Ltd
  • Sartori, G. (1997). Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry Into Structures,
  • Incentives, and Outcomes. New York: New York University Press
  • Soemantri, S. (1986). Hak Menguji Material di Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni
  • Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2011). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo
  • Persada, Jakarta
  • Siahaan, M. (2005). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta:
  • Konstitusi Press
  • Tocqueville, A.D. (1956). Democracy in America, Specially Edited and Abridge for the Modern
  • Reader by Richard D. Heffner. New York: A Mentor Book Published by The New
  • American Library
  • Jurnal
  • Ali, M.M., Hilipito, M.R., & Asy’ari, A. (2015). Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah
  • Konstitusi yang Bersifat Konstitusional Bersyarat Serta Memuat Norma Baru.
  • Jurnal Konstitusi 12(3), 631-662. doi: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk12310,
  • Asy’ari, S., Hilipito, M.R dan Ali, M.M. (2013). Model dan Implementasi Putusan
  • Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang (Studi Putusan Tahun
  • 2003-2012). Jurnal KonstitusI, 10(4), 675-708. doi:
  • https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1046
  • Cahyono, M. (2022). Mengoptimalkan Tingkat Kepatuhan Pembentuk Undang-Undang
  • Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Melalui Metode Weak-Form Review.
  • Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 11(1), 1-17
  • Damian, E., & Hornick, R.N. (1972). Indonesia’s Formal Legal System: An Introduction.
  • American Journal of Comparative Law, 20(3), 492-530. doi:
  • https://doi.org/10.2307/839317
  • Dressel, B. (2018). Megapolitical Cases Before the Constitutional Court of Indonesia Since
  • 2004: An Empirical Study. Constitutional Review, 4(2), 157-187. doi:
  • https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev421
  • Gardbaum, S. (2015). Are Strong Constitutional Courts Always a Good Thing for New
  • Democracies? Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 53
  • Hakim, A.R., & Pratiwi, Y.D. (2022). Positive Legislature dalam Putusan Mahkamah
  • Konstitusi Mengenai Upaya Hukum Putusan Penundaan Kewajiban
  • Pembayaran Utang. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(4), 933-956. doi:
  • https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1949
  • Indrayana, D., & Mochtar, Z.A. (2007). Komparasi Sifat Mengikat Putusan Judicial Review
  • Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Mimbar Hukum, 19(3),
  • 437-454. doi: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.19074
  • Kurniawan, I.G.A. (2022). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Undang-Undang
  • Cipta Kerja Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Utilitarianisme. Jurnal USM Law Review,
  • 5(1), 282-298. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4941
  • Laruffa, F. (2022). Neoliberalism, Economization and the Paradox of the New Welfare
  • State. European Journal of Sociology, 63(1), 131-163. doi:
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975622000169

PDF:

https://jurnal.harianregional.com/kerthapatrika/full-101966

Published

2023-12-30

How To Cite

HALMADININGRAT, I Made; HAFIDZ, Violla Reininda. Implementasi Mandat Konstitusional Putusan MK Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 dalam Dinamika Hubungan MK dengan Pembentuk Undang-Undang.Kertha Patrika, [S.l.], v. 45, n. 3, p. 268-294, dec. 2023. ISSN 2579-9487. Available at: https://jurnal.harianregional.com/kerthapatrika/id-101966. Date accessed: 08 Jul. 2024. doi:https://doi.org/10.24843/KP.2023.v45.i03.p02.

Citation Format

ABNT, APA, BibTeX, CBE, EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows), MLA, ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows), RefWorks, Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only), Turabian

Issue

Vol 45 No 3 (2023)

Section

Articles

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License