Authors:

I Dewa Ayu Inten Sri Damayanti, Suatra Putrawan

Abstract:

“The extraordinary remedy appeals in the form of invocation the judicial review arearranged in terms of the Book of Criminal Procedure Law (Kitab Undang-UndangHukum Acara Pidana-KUHAP) now can submitted more than once, according to thedecision issued by the Constitutional Court in the decision number 34/PUU-XI/2013.Itseems unfair if article 268 subsection (3) continues to apply, because the filingrestrictions of judicial review for the second time by the convicted or his heirs woundedsense of justice before the law (Article 28 D subsection (1) of the Republic of IndonesiaConstitusional 1945). Through normative legal research, this article aims to explain theimplication of the judicial decision number 34/PUU-XI/2013 against the provision ofarticle 268 subsection (3) KUHAP.”

Keywords

Keyword Not Available

Downloads:

Download data is not yet available.

References

References Not Available

PDF:

https://jurnal.harianregional.com/kerthanegara/full-10704

Published

2021-11-09

How To Cite

INTEN SRI DAMAYANTI, I Dewa Ayu; PUTRAWAN, Suatra. IMPLIKASI PUTUSAN NOMOR 34/PUU-XI/2013 MENGENAI JUDICIAL REVIEW PASAL 268 AYAT (3) TERHADAP UPAYA HUKUM LUAR BIASA PADA KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA.Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum, [S.l.], oct. 2014. Available at: https://jurnal.harianregional.com/kerthanegara/id-10704. Date accessed: 28 Aug. 2025.

Citation Format

ABNT, APA, BibTeX, CBE, EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows), MLA, ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows), RefWorks, Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only), Turabian

Issue

Vol. 02, No. 05, Oktober 2014

Section

Articles

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License