Authors:

I Wayan Swarautama Mahardhika, Hendry T.S.S.G. Saragih, Slamet Widiyanto, Budi Setiadi Daryono

Abstract:

“Egg quality can determine the fertility and reproductive efficiency of chickens. Selective breeding of Kambro chickens might have influenced the egg quality. This study aims to determine the influence of a selective breeding program on the egg quality of two Kambro chicken generations, F1Kambro (F2K)-crossbred and F2Kambro (F2K)-inbred. Inbreeding coefficient (F) and rate of inbreeding (Fx) of F­2K chickens were calculated. The egg collection record was analyzed based on its productivity, phenotype, weight, index, and exterior egg quality parameters. Exterior egg quality parameters were analyzed with mathematical formulae. Egg productivity in Hen Day Production (HDP) of F1K and F2K chickens for 270-days, respectively, was 24% and 16.5%. The heterosis value of F2K chicken was -31.25% indicating an inbreeding depression in egg productivity. The egg phenotype of F2K was classified into light-brown, cream, brown, and white. The mean egg weight (EW) of F1K and F2K, respectively, was 53.34 ± 2.34-grams and 54.92 ± 9.25-grams, thus were classified as small eggs. The eggshape index of F1K and F2K, respectively, were dominated by sharp eggs and round eggs. Exterior egg quality parameters of F1K and F2K based on GMD could be used as a predictor variable, meanwhile Sp (r = 1, p<0.001) could not be used to describe the disposition of the regression curve. The Fx and F values of F2K, respectively, were 4.925% and 25% close to the tolerance level of inbred-line inbreeding depression. Inbreeding depression was correlated with productivity and egg characteristics depression between F1K and F2K. Parental selection in a selective breeding program must be based on several factors, including inbreeding depression, inbreeding coefficient, inbreeding rate, and egg quality. The implementation of genomic selection may provide a solution to minimalize the effect and fluctuations of Fx and F.”

Keywords

Keyword Not Available

Downloads:

Download data is not yet available.

References

  • Abanikannda OTF, Leigh AO. 2012. Chicken age and egg morphometric measures on eggshell thickness. Archiva Zootechnica 15(1): 61-68. http://www.ibna.ro/arhiva/AZ%2015-1/AZ%2015-1_06%20Abanikannda.pdf
  • Adachi H., Murase D, Atomura S, Ohkubo T. 2012. Detection of leptin activity in living cells expressing chicken leptin receptor and STAT3. J Poult Sci 49: 46-50. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.011085
  • Aedah S, Djoefrie MHB, Suprayitno G. 2016. Factors that affecting competitiveness of poultry industry Kampong chicken (case study PT Dwi and Rachmat Farm, Bogor). Manajemen IKM 11(2): 173-182. http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jurnalmpi/
  • Anggitasari S, Sjofjan O, Djunaidi IH. 2016. Effect of some kinds of commercial feed on quantitative and qualitative production performance of broiler chicken. Buletin Peternakan 40(3): 187-196. https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v40i3.11622
  • Bamidele O, As Pvan, Elferink MG. 2012. Molecular characterization of the leptin receptor gene as a candidate gene in the pulmonary hypertension syndrome in broiler chickens. Pak J Biol Sci 15(24): 1187-1190. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2012.1187.119
  • Belitz HD, Grosch W, Schieberle P. 2009. Eggs. Food Chemistry p: 546-561. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69934-7_12
  • Cheng HW. 2010. Breeding of tomorrow’s chickens to improve well-being. Poult Sci 89: 805-813. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00361
  • Darwati S. 2000. Produktivitas ayam Kampung, Pelung dan resiprokalnya. Med Pet 23(2): 32-35. http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/mediapeternakan/article/view/11822
  • Darwati S, Sumantri C, Pratiwanggana AT. 2015. Production performance between F1 commercial meat type x Kampung chicken and Kampung chicken x commercial meat type at 0-12 weeks. J Ilmu Produksi dan Teknologi Hasil Peternakan 3(2): 72-78. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/ipthp/article/view/11858
  • Daryono BS, Roosdianto I, Saragih HTSSG. 2010. Pewarisan karakter fenotip ayam hasil persilangan ayam Pelung dengan ayam Cemani. J Veteriner (11) 4: 257-263. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/jvet/article/view/3460
  • Das SC, Chowdhury SD, Khatun MA, Nishibori M, Isobe N, Yoshimura Y. 2008. Poultry production profile and expected future projection in Bangladesh. World’s Poult Sci Assoc 64(1): 99-118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933907001754
  • Depison D. 2009. Karakteristik kuantitatif dan kualitatif hasil persilangan beberapa ayam lokal. J Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan 12(1): 7-13. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiiip.v0i0.484
  • Duman M, Şekeroğlu A, Yıldırım A, Eleroğlu H, Camcı Ö. 2016. Relation between egg shape index and egg quality characteristics. Europ Poult Sci 80: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2016.117
  • Eldik Pvan, van der Waaij EH, Ducro B, Kooper AW, Stout TAE, Colenbrander B. 2006. Possible negative effects of inbreeding on semen quality in Shetland Pony stallions. Theriogenology 65: 1159-1170.
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.08.001
  • Ernanto AR. 2017. Asosiasi polimorfisme gen PRL dan IGF-1 terhadap produktivitas telur ayam (Gallus gallus domesticus Linnaeus, 1758) F1 hasil persilangan ayam Pelung dan Layer. Thesis. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta.
  • Evaris EF, Franco LS, Castro CS. 2019. Slow-growing male chickens fit poultry production systems with outdoor access. World’s Poult Sci Assoc 75: 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933919000400
  • Ferlito C, Respatiadi H. 2018. Reformasi kebijakan pada industri unggas di Indonesia. Center for Indonesia Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.35497/271879
  • Halverson MA, Skelly DK, Caccone A. 2006. Inbreeding linked to amphibian survival in the wild but not in the laboratory. Journal of Heredity 97(5): 499-507. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esl019
  • Hameed T, Mustafa MZ, Taj MK, Asadullah, Bajwa MA, Bukhar FA, Kiani MMT, Ahmed A. 2016. Hatchability and fertility in broiler breeder stock. JCBPS 6(2): 266-274.
  • Havlíček M, Nedomová Š, Simeonovová J, Severa L, Křivánek I. 2008. On the evaluation of chicken egg shape variability. Acta univ agric et silvic Mendel Brun 56(5): 69–74. https://doi.org/10.11118/ACTAUN200856050069
  • Henuk YL, Bakti D. 2018. Benefits of promoting native chickens for sustainable rural poultry development in Indonesia. TALENTA Conference Series: Agricultural & Natural Resources (ANR). Medan. North Sumatra. 18-19 August. 2016. 1(2): 69-76. https://doi.org/10.32734/anr.v1i1.98
  • Hidayat C. 2012. Pengembangan produksi ayam lokal berbasis bahan pakan lokal. Wartazoa 22(2): 85-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.14334/wartazoa.v22i2.853
  • Hidayat C, Asmarasari SA. 2015. Native chicken production in Indonesia: a review. J Peternakan Indonesia 17(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.25077/jpi.17.1.1-11.2015
  • Ikegwu TM, Balogu VT, Balogu DO, Kolo SI, Babatunde J. 2016. Physical properties of hen’s egg. Journal of Foods Natural and Life Sciences 1: 16-23.
  • Kabir MdA, Islam MS, Dutta RK. 2012. Egg morphometric analyses in chickens and some selected birds. Univ j zool Rajshahi Univ (31): 85-87. https://doi.org/10.3329/ujzru.v31i0.15439
  • König S, Tsehay F, Sitzenstock F, von Borstel UU, Schmutz M, Preisinger R, Simianer H. 2010. Evaluation of inbreeding in laying hens by applying optimum genetic contribution and gene flow theory. Poultry Science 89: 658-667. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00543
  • Lohmann Tierzucht. 2019. Management guide layers. Germany. p: 1-40.
  • Lukanov H, Genchev A, Pavlov A. 2015. Colour traits of chicken eggs with different eggshell pigmentation. Trakia Journal of Sciences 2: 149-158. https://doi.org/10.15547/tjs.2015.02.007
  • Mahardhika IWS, Daryono BS. 2019. Phenotypic performance of Kambro crossbreeds of female broiler Cobb 500 and male Pelung Blirik Hitam. Buletin Veteriner Udayana 11(2): 188-202. https://doi.org/10.24843/bulvet.2019.v11.i02.p12
  • Makanjuola BO, Olori VE, Mrode RA. 2021. Modelling genetic components of hatch of fertile in broiler breeders. Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101062
  • Mariandayani HN, Darwati S, Sutanto E and Sinaga E. 2017. Peningkatan produktivitas ayam lokal melalui persilangan tiga rumpun ayam lokal pada generasi kedua. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi 2017: Pendidikan Biologi untuk Masa Depan Bumi. Aceh (Indonesia): Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Syiah Kuala. p. 139-146.
  • Maulidi IS, Puspita UE, Mahardhika IWS, Daryono BS. 2020. The inheritance of phenotype character of feather color and growth of hybrid chicken (Gallus gallus gallus, Linnaeus 1758) derived from crossing of F1 ♀ Kamper and ♂ Kambro. AIP Conf Proc. 2260: 060010. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0017639
  • Muntasiah D, Tantalo S, Nova K, Sutrisna R. 2019. The effect of giving rations with different of herbs dosages on the external quality of crossbred chicken eggs. Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi Peternakan 3(1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.23960/jrip.2019.3.1.1-6
  • Narushin VG. 2005. Egg geometry calculation using the measurements of length and breadth. Poultry Science 84: 482–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.3.482
  • Nataamijaya AG. 2010. Pengembangan potensi ayam lokal untuk menunjang peningkatan kesejahteraan petani. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian 29(4): 131-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/jp3.v29n4.2010.p131-138
  • Nietlisbach P, Keller LF, Camenish G, Guillaume F, Arcesee P, Reid JM, Postma E. 2017. Pedigree-based inbreeding coefficient explains more variation in fitness than heterozygosity at 160 microsatellites in a wild bird population. Proc R Soc B 284: 2016-2763. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2763
  • Ningsih R, Prabowo DW. 2017. The level of market integration of chicken broiler at main production center: case study East Java and West Java. Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan 11(2): 247-270. https://doi.org/10.30908/bilp.v11i2.231
  • Nwagu BI, Olorunju SAS, Oni OO, Eduvie LO, Adeyinka IA, Sekoni AA, Abeke FO. 2007. In-Breeding effect on performance of Rhode Island chickens selected for part-period egg production. International Journal of Poultry Science 6(1): 13-17. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2007.13.17
  • Oldenbroek K, van der Waaij L. 2014. Textbook animal breeding: animal breeding and genetics for B.Sc. students. Centre for Genetic Resources (Netherlands): The Netherlands and Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/524548
  • Özbey O, Esen F. 2007. The effects of different breeding systems on egg productivity and egg quality characteristics of Rock Partridges. Poultry Science 86: 782-785. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.4.782
  • Paczoska-Eliasiewicz HE, Gertler A, Proszkowiec M, Proudman J, Hrabia A, Sechman A, Mika M, Jacek T, Cassy S, Raver N, Rząsa J. 2003. Attenuation by leptin of the effects of fasting on ovarian function in hens (Gallus domesticus). Reproduction 126: 739-751. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1260739
  • Perdamaian ABI, Trijoko, Daryono BS. 2017. Growth and plumage color uniformity of backcross (BC2) chicken resulted from genetics selection of Pelung chicken and broiler crossed. J Veteriner 18(4): 557-564. https://doi.org/10.19087/jveteriner.2017.18.4.557
  • Sami A, Fitriani. 2019. Feed efficiency and addition of KUB chicken bodies that given phytobiotics with various concentrations. Jurnal Galung Tropika 8(2): 147-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.31850/jgt.v8i2.501
  • Saragih HTSSG, Daryono BS. 2010. Histological study on the pancreatic  -cell number of indigenous chicks in first crossbred (F1). J Indonesian Trop Anim Agric 35(3): 201-205.
  • Sawitri R, Takandjandji M. 2012. Inbreeding pada populasi Banteng (Bos javanicus, d’Alton 1832) di Kebun Binatang Surabaya. Buletin Plasma Nutfah 18(2): 84-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/blpn.v18n2.2012.p84-94
  • Sekeroğlu A, Kayaalp GT, Sarica M. 2000: The regression and correlation analysis on egg parameters in Denizli poultry. Journal of Agricultural Faculty, Cukurova University 15: 69-74.
  • Seroussi E, Cinnamon Y, Yosefi S, Genin O, Smith JG, Rafati N, Friedman-Einat M. 2016. Identification of the long-sought leptin in chicken and duck: expression pattern of the highly GC-rich avian leptin fits an autocrine/paracrine rather than endocrine function. Endocrinology 157(2): 737-751. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2015-1634
  • Seroussi E, Pitel F, Leroux S, Morisson M, Bornelöv S, Miyara S, Yosefi S, Cogburn LA, Burt DW, Andersson L, Friedman-Einat M. 2017. Correction: Mapping of leptin and its syntenic genes to chicken chromosome 1p. BMC Genetics 18(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-017-0587-2
  • Setiadi B. 2016. Strategy to fulfill the requirements for concession and release of new animal breed or strain. Wartazoa 26(3): 133-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.14334/wartazoa.v26i3.1395
  • Sewalem A, Johansson K, Wilhelmson M, Lippers K. 1999. Inbreeding and inbreeding depression on reproduction and production traits of White leghorn lines selected for egg production traits. J Dairy Sci 40: 203-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669987601
  • Shad AGK, Zalani AM, Nasr J. 2013. Estimation of genetic parameters, inbreeding trend and its effects on production and reproduction traits of native fowls in fars province. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 16(12): 598-600. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2013.598.600
  • Sudrajat, Isyanto AY. 2018. Keragaan peternakan ayam sentul di Kabupaten Ciamis. Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis 4(2): 237-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/ma.v4i2.1438
  • Suprijatna E. 2010. Strategy of local chicken development base on local resources and environment. Seminar Nasional Unggas Lokal ke IV, 7 Oktober 2010. Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Diponegoro. p: 55-88
  • Szwaczkowski T, Cywa-Benko K, Stanislaw W. 2003. A note on inbreeding effects on productive and reproductive traits in laying hens. Animal Science Papers and Reports 21: 121-129.
  • Tabun Ach, Ndoen B, Liunokas D. 2010. Evaluasi sifat produksi telur dan berat telur ayam lokal Nusa Tenggara Timur. PARTNER 17(1): 33-36
  • Tanjung A, Saragih HTSSG, Trijoko, Soenarwan HP, Widiyanto S, Mahardhika IWS, Daryono BS. 2019. Short communication: Polymorphism of myostatin gene and its association with body weight traits in a hybrid of GAMA chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus, Linn. 1758). Biodiversitas 20(11): 3207-3212. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d201113
  • Telalbasic R, Baban M, Rahmanovic A. 2007. Inbreeding. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 23(5-6): 113-130. https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH0702113T
  • Wakchaure R, Ganguly S. 2015. Inbreeding, its effects and applications in animal genetics and breeding: a review. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering. 5(9): 73-76.
  • Wang Y, Li H, Zhang Y, Gu Z, Li Z, Wang Q. 2006. Analysis on association of a SNP in the chicken OBR gene with growth and body composition traits. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 19(12): 1706–1710. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1706
  • Waranusast R, Intayod P, Makhod D. 2017. Egg size classification on android mobile devices using image processing and machine learning. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT-ISPC.2016.7519263
  • Wolc A, Zhao HH, Arango J, Settar P, Fulton JE, O’Sullivan NP, Preisinger R, Stricker C, Habier D, Fernando RL, Garrick DJ, Lamont SJ, Dekker JCM. 2015. Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens. Genomic Selection Evolution. 47: 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0133-5
  • Yerturk M, Avci M, Bozkaya F. 2008. Effects of closed breeding on some reproductive performance of a small Japanese quail flock in Sanliurfa. J Anim Vet Adv 7: 963-967.
  • Zhou P, Zheng W, Zhao C, Shen C, Sun G. 2009. Egg volume and surface area calculations based on machine vision. in IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Volume 295, Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture II, Volume 3, eds. D. Li, Z. Chunjiang, (Boston: Springer). pp: 1647-1653. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0213-9_15

PDF:

https://jurnal.harianregional.com/buletinvet/full-75029

Published

2022-01-27

How To Cite

MAHARDHIKA, I Wayan Swarautama et al. EGG QUALITY DETERMINATION OF F1 AND F2 CHICKEN SELECTED CROSSBRED OF BROILER COBB 500 x PELUNG.Buletin Veteriner Udayana, [S.l.], p. 129-147, jan. 2022. ISSN 2477-2712. Available at: https://jurnal.harianregional.com/buletinvet/id-75029. Date accessed: 08 Jul. 2024. doi:https://doi.org/10.24843/bulvet.2022.v14.i02.p10.

Citation Format

ABNT, APA, BibTeX, CBE, EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows), MLA, ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows), RefWorks, Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only), Turabian

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 2 April 2022

Section

Articles

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License