Authors:

Anggie Ray Salvatore, I Nyoman Suparwa, Made Sri Satyawati

Abstract:

“Hate speech is a language phenomenon that often appears on social media nowadays. This was exacerbated by the political intensity between supporting and opposing groups of the government. The commentary column which contains news on the topic of government is one of the ways to spread hate speeches. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the hate speech that appears in the commentary column of an online news media called BABE with the aim of finding the form of lingual markers, the speech act meaning, and the speech act function of the hate speech. The results of this study found that lingual markers in hate speech were divided into three categories, namely words, phrases and utterances. The meaning of hate speech is illocutionary and is classified into seven types of hate speech, including insult, defamation, desecration, unpleasant action, provocation, incitement, and hoax. Meanwhile, the speech act function that appears in hate speech has four speech act functions, namely the assertive function, the directive function, the commissive function, and the expressive function.”

Keywords

Keyword Not Available

Downloads:

Download data is not yet available.

References

  • Austin, John Langshaw. (1962). How to Do Things With Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Chaer, Abdul. (2010). Kesantunan berbahasa. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
  • Cohen, Henri, and C. Claire Lefebvre. (2005). Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Haryatmoko. (2011). Etika Publik. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  • Hirsch, Susan F. (2008). Putting Hate Speech in Context: Observation on Speech, Power, and Violence in Kenya. George Mason University. Diakses tanggal 2 Agustus 2020
  • http://www.ushmm.org.m.pdfs/20100423-speech-power-violence-hirsch.pdf.
  • Isasi, Alex Cabo and Ana García Juanatey. (2016). El discurso del odio en las redes sociales: Un estado de la cuestión. Ajuntament de Barcelona progress report. Diakses tanggal 12 Januari 2021
  • http://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/bcnvsodi/wpcontent/uploads/2017/02/Informe_discurso-del-odio_ES.pdf.
  • Kapolri. (2015). Penanganan Ujaran Kebencian. Surat Edaran Kapolri Nomor SE/06/X/2015. Jakarta
  • Linawati. (2017). “Tindak Tutur Ujaran Kebencian dalam Komentar Pembaca pada Surat Kabar Online Tribunnews.com”. (Skripsi). Yogyakarta: Program Studi Bahasa Indonesia, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Mawarti, Sri. (2018). Fenomena Hate Speech: Dampak Ujaran Kebencian. Toleransi, 10 (1). hlm 83-95
  • Ningrum, Dian Junita. (2018). Kajian Ujaran Kebencian di Media Sosial, Jurnal Ilmiah Korpus, 2(3).hlm 241-252
  • Nasrullah, R. (2017). Media Sosial : Perspektif Komunikasi, Budaya, dan Sosioteknologi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  • Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Senata Dharma University Press.
  • Syafyahya, Leni. (2018). Ujaran Kebencian dalam Bahasa Indonesia: Kajian Bentuk dan Makna. Makalah Kongres KBI 2018. Universitas Andalas, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia
  • Yule, George. (2006). Pragmatik (edisi terjemahan oleh Indah Fajar Wahyuni dan Rombe Mustajab). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

PDF:

https://jurnal.harianregional.com/sastra/full-77123

Published

2022-02-28

How To Cite

SALVATORE, Anggie Ray; SUPARWA, I Nyoman; SRI SATYAWATI, Made. Ujaran Kebencian dalam Kolom Komentar Media Berita Online BABE.Humanis, [S.l.], v. 26, n. 1, p. 125-139, feb. 2022. ISSN 2302-920X. Available at: https://jurnal.harianregional.com/sastra/id-77123. Date accessed: 28 Aug. 2025. doi:https://doi.org/10.24843/JH.2022.v26.i01.p13.

Citation Format

ABNT, APA, BibTeX, CBE, EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows), MLA, ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows), RefWorks, Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only), Turabian

Issue

Vol 26 No 1 (2022)

Section

Articles

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License