PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WANPRESTASI DALAM PERJANJIAN WARALABA (STUDI PADA PERJANJIAN WARALABA C’BEZT DENPASAR)
on
Authors:
I Made Parta Wedhana Dwiyoga, Putri Triari Dwijayanthi
Abstract:
“Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendalami perlindungan hukum bagi franchisee dalam pelaksanaan perjanjian waralaba (studi kasus pada perjanjian waralaba C’bezt Denpasar). Jenis penelitian yang digunakan yakni yuridis normatif yang bersifat deskriptif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (the statute approach) dan fakta (fact approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, dalam praktiknya perjanjian waralaba C’bezt belum sepenuhnya dilaksanakan sesuai dengan landasan hukum waralaba yakni Peraturan Pemerintah No. 42 Tahun 2007 Tentang Waralaba dan masih ditemukan adanya pelanggaran oleh franchisor kepada franchisee , sehingga menimbulkan ketidakadilan dan kerugian bagi franchisee . Penyelesaian kasus wanprestasi dan komitmen dalam menegakkan perlindungan hukum bagi penerima waralaba C’bezt Denpasar dilakukan melalui upaya penyelesaiannya melalui tahapan pemberitahuan, musyawarah, dan litigasi. Dalam pelaksanaan waralaba disarankan bagi franchisee dan franchisor harus melaksanakan kewajiban sesuai dengan perjanjian yang disepakati bersama agar kasus wanprestasi dapat diminimalisir sehingga kedua belah pihak sama-sama diuntungkan. This study aims to explore legal protection for franchisee s in the implementation of franchise agreements (a case study on the Denpasar C’bezt franchise agreement). The type of research used is normative juridical which is descriptive in nature with the statute approach and facts (fact approach). The results of the study indicate that, in practice, the C’bezt franchise agreement has not been fully implemented in accordance with the legal basis of the franchise, namely Government Regulation no. 42 of 2007 and still found violations by the franchisor to the franchisee , causing injustice and harm to the franchisee . Settlement of default cases and commitments in enforcing legal protection for C’bezt Denpasar franchisee s is carried out through settlement efforts through the stages of notification, deliberation, and litigation. In the implementation of franchising, it is recommended that franchisee’s and franchisor’s must carry out their obligations in accordance with mutually agreed agreements so that cases of default can be minimized so that both parties benefit equally.”
Keywords
Keyword Not Available
Downloads:
Download data is not yet available.
References
References Not Available
PDF:
https://jurnal.harianregional.com/kerthasemaya/full-89233
Published
2022-07-23
How To Cite
DWIYOGA, I Made Parta Wedhana; DWIJAYANTHI, Putri Triari. PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WANPRESTASI DALAM PERJANJIAN WARALABA (STUDI PADA PERJANJIAN WARALABA C’BEZT DENPASAR).Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 9, p. 2147-2157, july 2022. ISSN 2303-0569. Available at: https://jurnal.harianregional.com/kerthasemaya/id-89233. Date accessed: 28 Aug. 2025. doi:https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2022.v10.i09.p15.
Citation Format
ABNT, APA, BibTeX, CBE, EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows), MLA, ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows), RefWorks, Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only), Turabian
Issue
Vol 10 No 9 (2022)
Section
Articles
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Discussion and feedback