Authors:

Eny Sulistyaningrum, Septyono Kurniawan

Abstract:

“Labors have weaker bargaining position than the employer because of higher proportion of labor supply than demand. Employment in Indonesia only reaches 60 percent of the labor force. Labor union is formed to provide a more bargaining position for labor in relation to the employer. This study aims to analyze the impact of labor union toward labor wage, especially for workers who works in the private sector in Indonesia. The data used is the data from IFLS wave 4 and 5. This paper using PSM with kernel matching method to analyze the data. The results show that on average, private sector workers in Indonesia who participate in union membership will have a higher wage of 17 percent compared with workers outside the union.”

Keywords

Keyword Not Available

Downloads:

Download data is not yet available.

References

  • Abadie, A., dan Imbens, G. W. (2015, Agustus). Matching on the Estimated Propensity Score. NBER, 1-26.
  • ADB. (2006). Impact Evaluation: Metodological and Operational issues. Economics and Research Departement, 1-35.
  • Austin, P. C. (2011). An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Stuides. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 399-424.
  • Bappenas. (2008). Studi Evaluasi (Impact) Penataan Daerah Otonomi Baru: Ringkasan Eksekutif. Jakarta: Direktorat Otonomi Daerah Deputi Bidang Pengembangan Regional dan Otonomi Daerah - Bappenas.
  • Becker, S. O., dan Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Based on Propensity Score. The Stata Journal , 2, No. 4, 358-377.
  • Blanchflower, D. G., dan Bryson, A. (2004). Union Reltive Wage Effects in the United States and the United Kingdom. IRRA 56th Annual Proceedings, 133-140.
  • Blanchflower, D. G., dan Bryson, A. (2004). What Effect Do Unions Have on Wage Now and Would “What Do Unions Do?” Be Surprised? National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, No. 9973, 384-414.
  • Blundell, R., dan Dias, M. C. (2000). Evaluation Methods for Non-Experimental Data. Fiscal Studies , Vol. 21, No. 4, 427-468.
  • Blundell, R., Dearden, L., dan Sianesi, B. (2005). Evaluating the Effect of Education on Earnings: Models, Methods and Results from the National Child Development Survey. Royal Statistics Society, 473-513.
  • Borjas, G. J. (2013). Labor Economics, Sixth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • BPS. (2016). Penduduk Berumur 15 Tahun Ke Atas yang Bekerja Selama Seminggu yang Lalu Menurut Status
  • Pekerjaan Utama dan Lapangan Pekerjaan 2011, 2012, 2013, dan 2014. Dipetik September 26, 2016, dari https://www.bps.go.id/linkTabelStatis/view/id/971
  • BPS. (2016). Penduduk Berumur 15 Tahun Ke Atas yang Bekerja Selama Seminggu yang Lalu Menurut Status Pekerjaan Utama dan Pendidikan Tertinggi yang Ditamatkan 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 dan 2015. Dipetik September 26, 2016, dari https://www.bps.go.id/linkTabelStatis/view/id/1932
  • BPS. (2016). Perkembangan Upah Minimum Regional/Propinsi di Seluruh Indonesia (dalam Ribuan Rupiah) 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, dan 2014. Dipetik September 26, 2016, dari https://www.bps.go.id/linkTableDinamis/view/id/917
  • Bryson, A. (2014). Union Wage Effect: What Are the Economic Implications of Union Wage Bargaining for Workers, Firms, and Society? IZA World of Labor, 1-10.
  • Bryson, A., Cappelari, L., dan Lucfora, C. (2003). Why so Unhappy? The Effect of Union Membership on Job Satisfaction. Future of Trade Unions in Modern Britain , 1-41.
  • Bryson, A., Dorsett, R., dan Purdon, S. (2002). The Use of Propensity Score Matching in The Evaluation of Active Labour Market Policies. Policy Studies Institute and National Center for Social Research, 1-52.
  • Budiarti, I. (2008). Serikat Pekerja (on Strike Unfair Labor Practice). PSI Coordinator Indonesia, 1-13.
  • Cai, L., dan Waddoups, C. J. (2011). Union Wage Effects in Australia: Evidence from Panel Data. British Journal of Industrial Relationship, Vol. 49, 279-305.
  • Calliendo, M., dan Kopeinig, S. (2005). Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 1588, 1-29.
  • Card, D. (2001). The Effect of Union on Wage Inequality in the U.S. Labor Market. Industrial and Labor Relation Review, Vol. 54, No. 2, 296-315.
  • Centeno, M., dan Novo, A. A. (2014). The Impact of Unionization on Employment and Wages. IZA Discussion Paper (Preliminary), 1-21.
  • Chrysantou, G. M. (2010). The Impact of Unionization on Employment and Wages. Universidad Carlos III De Madrid Working Paper, 10-14.
  • Dehejia, R. H., dan Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Non-Experimental Causal Studies. The Review of Economics and Ststistics, Vol. 84, No. 1, 151-161.
  • DiNardo, J., dan Lee, D. S. (2004). Economic Impacts of New Unionization on Private Sector Employers: 1984–2001. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 119, No. 4, 1383–1441.
  • Eldy, E., dan Ari Pradhanawati, H. S. (2014). Pengaruh Upah, Peran Serikat Pekerja terhadap Kesejahteraan Pekerja Melalui Unjuk Rasa Pada Sekretariat Pekerja PSP PT SAI Apparel Industries. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Bisnis, Vol. 3, No. 3, 51-60.
  • Frandsen, B. R. ( 2012). Why Unions Still Matter: The Effects of Unionization on the Distribution of Employee Earnings. MIT Economics , 1-45.
  • Freeman, R. B., dan Kleiner, M. M. (1990). The Impact of New Unionization on Wages and Working Conditions. Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 8, No. 1, Pt. 2, S8-S25.
  • Ge, Y. (2007). What Do Unions Do in China. University of International Business and Economics Working Paper , 1-57.
  • Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. B., dan Vermeersch, C. M. (2011). Impact Evaluation in Practice. Washington DC: The World Bank.
  • Greenland, S. (1996). Basic Methods for Sensitivity Analysis of Biases. International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 25, No. 6, 1107 - 1116.
  • Grotta, A., dan Belloco, R. (2014, November 13). A Review of Propensity Score: Principles, Methods and Application in Stata. Italian Stata Users Group Meeting .
  • Gujarati, D. N., dan Porter, D. C. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Ekonometrika (5 ed.). (D. A. Halim, L. Febrina, Penyunt., dan R. C. Mangunsong, Penerj.) Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.
  • Handouyahia, A., Haddad, T., dan Eaton, F. (2013). Kernel Matching versus Inverse Probability Weighting: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Mathematical, Computational, Physical, Electrical and Engineering , Vol.7, No. 8, 1218-1233.
  • Harder, V. S., Stuart, E. A., dan Anthony, J. C. (2011, September 1). Propensity Score Techniques and the Assessment of Measured Covariate Balance to Test Causal Associations in Psychological Research. Psycological Methods, Vol. 15, No. 3, 234-249.
  • Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., dan Todd, P. (1998). Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator. Review of Economic Studies , No. 65, 261-294.
  • Hedrastomo, G. (2010). Menakar Kesejahteraan Buruh: Memperjuangkan Kesejahteraan Buruh di antara Kepentingan Negara dan Korporasi. Jurnal Informasi, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1-17.
  • Heinrich, C., Maffioli, A., dan Vazquez, G. (2010). A Primer for Applying Propensity-Score Matching. IDB: Impact Evaluation Guidelines Technical Notes, No. IDB-TN-161, 1-56.
  • Hirsch, B. T. (2004). Reconsidering Union Wage Effects: Surveying New Evidance on an Old Topic. Journal of Labor research, Vol. XXV, No. 3, 234-266.
  • Hirsch, B. T. (2004). What Do Union Do for Economic Performance. Journal of Labor Research, Vol. XXV, No. 3, 416-455.
  • Husni, L. (2003). Pengantar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
  • ILO. (1948). Deklarasi Universal Hak Asasi Manusia.
  • ILO. (2006). Manual untuk Serikat Pekerja Indonesia tentang Administrasi Serikat Pekerja. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
  • ILO. (2012). Profil Pekerjaan yang Layak Indonesia. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
  • ILO. (2015). Tren Ketenagakerjaan dan Sosial di Indonesia 2014-2015: Memperkuat Daya Saing dan Produktivitas Melalui Pekerjaan Layak. Jakarta: Kantor Perburuhan Internasional.
  • Jorgensen, O. (2008, September 2). Union Wage Premium in South Africa - An Instrumental Variable Approach (Work in Progress). Guest Lectures Seminars on University of Oslo, 1-36.
  • Katuuk, N. F. (1996). Hubungan Industrial Pancasila: Seri Diktat Kuliah. Jakarta: Penerbit Gunadarma - Chandra Pratama.
  • Khandker, S. R., Koolwal, G. B., dan Samad, H. A. (2010). Handbook on Impact Evaluation: Quantitative Methods and Practice. Washington DC: The World Bank.
  • Kuhn, P., dan Marquez, G. (2005). What Difference Do Unions Make? Their Impact on Productivity and Wages in Latin America. Washington, D.C: Inter-American Development Bank.
  • Lalonde, R. J., Marschke, G., dan Troske, K. (1996). Using Longitudinal Data on Establishments to Analyze the Effects of Union Organizing Campaigns in the United States. Annales d’ Economie et de Statistique, Vol. 41–42 .
  • Lance, P. M., Guilkey, D. K., Hattori, A., dan Angeles, G. (2014). How Do We Know if a Program Made a Difference?: A Guide to Statistical Methods for Program Impact Evaluation. Nort Carolina: Measure Evaluation.
  • Lee, D., dan Mas, A. (2009). Long-Run Impacts of Unions on Firms: New Evidence from Financial Markets, 1961–1999. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 14709.
  • Lemieux, T. (1998). Estimating the Effects of Unions on Wage Inequality in a Panel Data Model with Comparative Advantage and Nonrandom Selection. Journal of Labor Economics, Vol.16, No. 2 , 261–291.
  • Li, M. (2012). Using the Propensity Score Method to Estimate Causal Effects: A Review and Practical Guide. Organizational Research Methods 00(0), 1-39.
  • Lu, Y., Tao, Z., dan Wang, Y. (2010). Union Effects on Performance and Employment Relations: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, Vol. 21 No. 1, 202-210.
  • Madheswaran, S., dan Shanmugam, K. (2004). Wage Differentials between Union and Non-Union Workers: An Econometric Analysis. Far Eastern Meetings from Econometric Society, No. 413 .
  • Mishel, L., dan Walters, M. (2003). How Union Help All Workers. Economic Policy Institute Briefing Paper, No. 202/775-8810 , 1-18.
  • Nannicini, T. (2007). A Simulation-Based Sensitivity Analysis for Matching Estimator. The Stata Journal , Vol. 7, No. 3, 334 - 350.
  • Nardo, J. D., dan Lee, D. S. (2004). Economic Impacts of New Unionization on Private Sector Employers: 1984–2001. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 119, No. 4 , 1383–1441.
  • Neumark, D., dan Wachter, M. L. (1992). Union Threat Effects and Nonunion Industry Wage Differentials. NBED Working Paper, No.4046 , 1-32.
  • Pan, W., dan Bai, H. (2015). Propensity Score Analysis : Concepts and Issues. Dalam W. Pan, dan H. Bai, Propensity Score Analysis : Fundamental and Developments (hal. 3-20). New York: The Gulford Press.
  • Peraturan Menteri Tenaga Kerja Republik Indonesia No. 1 Tahun 1990 Tentang Perubahan Peraturan Menteri Tenaga Kerja Republik Indonesia No. 5 Tahun 1989 tentang Upah Minimum. (1990).
  • Peraturan Menteri Tenaga Kerja Republik Indonesia Nomor: PER-01/MEN/1999 Tentang Upah Minimum. (2000, Oktober 5).
  • Pujiastuti, D. (2010). Peranan Serikat Pekerja Dalam Menciptakan Hubungan Industrial Yang Harmonis di PT. Air Mancur Karanganyar Tahun 2008. Skripsi. Surakarta: FKIP - Universitas Sebelas Maret (tidak dipublikasikan).
  • Rios-Avila, F. (2013). Essays on Unions, Wages and Performance: Evidance from Latin America. Departement of Economics Georgia State University: Economics Dissertations , 1-155.
  • Rios-Avila, F. (2014). Unions and Economic Performance in Developing Countries: Case Studies from Latin America . Levi Economics Institute of Bard Collage Working Paper , No. 787, ISSN 1547-366X, 1-47 .
  • Rios-Avila, F., dan Hirsch, B. T. (2012). Unions, Wage Gaps, and Wage Dispersion: New Evidence from the Americas. IZA Working Paper , No. 6757, 1-31.
  • Ritonga, R. (2014). Kebutuhan Data Ketenagakerjaan Untuk Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Direktorat Statistik Kependudukan dan Ketenagakerjaan Badan Pusat Statistik .
  • Rosenbaum, P. R. (2005). Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Studies. Ensyclopedia of Statistical in Behavioral Science , Vol. 4, 1809-1814.
  • Rosenbaum, P. R., dan Rubin, D. B. (1983, April). The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrica , Vol. 70, No. 1, 41-55.
  • Sawal, H., dan Sabarwal, S. (2014, September). Quasi-Experimental Design and Methods. Methodological Briefs Impact Evaluation , No. 8, 1-13.
  • Schmitt, J., dan Woo, N. (2013). Women Workers and Unions. Center For Economic And Policy Research (CEPR) , 1-4.
  • Schultz, T. P. (1997). Labor Unions and the Distribution of Wages and Employment in South Africa. Economic Growth Center, Center Discussion Paper, No. 776 , 1-46.
  • Setiawan, E. (2012-2016, versi 1.9). Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kemendikbud (Pusat Bahasa). Dipetik September 26, 2016, dari Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI), Kamus versi online/daring (dalam jaringan): http://kbbi.web.id/buruh
  • Sherk, J. (2009). What Unions Do: How Labor Unions Affect Jobs and the Economy. The Backgrounder , No. 2775, 1-17.
  • Sianesi, B. (2001). Implementing Propensity Score Matching Estimator with Stata. UK Stata User Group, VII Meeting , London: University of College London and Institute for Fiscal Studies.
  • Simanjuntak, P. J. (2003). Manajemen Hubungan Industrial. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
  • Simanjuntak, P. J. (2002). Undang-Undang yang Baru tentang Serikat Pekerja/Seikat Buruh: Buku Panduan. Jakarta: Kantor Perburuhan Internasional.
  • Starks, H., dan Garrido, M. M. (2014, Oktober 20). Observational & Quasi-experimental Research Methods. 8th Annual Kathleen Foley Palliative Care Retreat .
  • Steiner, P. M., dan Cook, D. (2014). Matching and Propensity Score. Dalam T. D. Little, The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods in Psycology (hal. 237-259). New York: Oxford Library of Psycology.
  • Sulistyaningrum, E. (2015). Impact Evaluation of The School Operational Assistance Program (BOS) using Matching Method. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business , Vol. 31, No. 1, 35– 62.
  • Todd, P. E. (1999, October 1-13). A Practical Guide to Implementing Matching Estimator. IADB Meeting in Santiago, Chile .
  • Todd, P. E. (2006, October). Matching Estimator. Working Papers University of Pennsylvania , 1-11.
  • Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 1957 Tentang Penyelesaian Masalah Perburuhan. (1957, April 8).
  • Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. (2002, Agustus 10). Perubahan Keempat .
  • Undang-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2003. (25 Maret 2003). Tentang Ketenagakerjaan . Sekretariat Negara.
  • Undang-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2000. (4 Agustus 2000). Tentang Serikat Buruh/Serikat Pekerja . Sekretariat Negara.
  • Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 1992 Tentang Jaminan Sosial Tenaga Kerja. (1992, Februari 17).
  • White, H., Sabarwal, S., dan Hoop, T. d. (2014). Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). Methodological Briefs Impact Evaluation , No. 7, 1-11.
  • Wikipedia. (2016). Buruh. Dipetik September 26, 2016, dari Wikipedia Bahasa Indonesia, Ensiklopedia Bebas: https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/buruh
  • Wikipedia. (2016). Hak. Dipetik September 26, 2016, dari Wikipedia Bahasa Indonesia, Ensiklopedia Bebas: https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/hak
  • Wisnuthomo, N. H. (2014). Peran Serikat Pekerja dalam Penetapan Upah Minimum Buruh dan Penyelesaian Masalah Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja. Salatiga: FEB - Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana (tidak dipublikasikan).
  • Wooldrigde, J. M. (2009). Introduction Econometrics: A Modern Approach (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publisher.Ltd.
  • Wunnava, P. V. (2012). Recent Longitudinal Evidence of Size and Union Threat Effects across Genders. IZA Discussion Paper , No. 6779, 1-12.
  • Yao, Y., dan Zhong, N. (2013). Unions and Workers’ Welfare in Chinese Firms. Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 31, No. 3 , 1-45.
  • Yao, Y., dan Zhong, N. (2010). Unions Improve Chinese Workers’ Welfare: Results from 1,268 Firms. Journal of Labor Economics , Vol. 31, No. 3, 1-45.
  • Zhong, N. (2013). Corporate Governance and Labor Welfare: Evidance from Chinese Private Firms. 1-48.
  • Zivot, E. (2012, Mei 22). Introduction to Pooled Cross Section and Panel Data. Econ , No. 582.

PDF:

https://jurnal.harianregional.com/jekt/full-25259

Published

2017-08-29

How To Cite

SULISTYANINGRUM, Eny; KURNIAWAN, Septyono. Dampak Serikat Buruh Terhadap Tingkat Upah Buruh Sektor Swasta di Indonesia.Jurnal Ekonomi Kuantitatif Terapan, [S.l.], aug. 2017. ISSN 2303-0186. Available at: https://jurnal.harianregional.com/jekt/id-25259. Date accessed: 08 Jul. 2024. doi:https://doi.org/10.24843/JEKT.2017.v10.i02.p09.

Citation Format

ABNT, APA, BibTeX, CBE, EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows), MLA, ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows), RefWorks, Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only), Turabian

Issue

2017: Vol. 10, No. 2, Agustus 2017 (pp. 110 - 252)

Section

Articles

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License