DIRECTORY OF

OPEN ACCESS

JOURNALS


P-ISSN: 2548-5962      ORIGINAL ARTICLE

E-ISSN: 2548-981X


https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/jbn


Comparison of Mortality and Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) between Craniotomy and Decompressive Craniectomy in Patients with Traumatic Acute Subdural Hematoma at Sanglah General Hospital, Bali

Ni Luh Putu Julita Yanti1*, I Wayan Niryana2, Sri Maliawan2, I Nyoman Semadi3, Tjokorda G.

B. Mahadewa2, I G. A. B. Krisna Wibawa4

  • 1    Resident of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Sanglah General Hospital, Bali, Indonesia.

  • 2    Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Sanglah General Hospital, Bali, Indonesia.

  • 3    Department of Surgery, Thoracic and Cardiovascular Division, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Sanglah General Hospital, Bali, Indonesia.

  • 4    Department of Surgery, Vascular Division, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Sanglah General Hospital, Bali, Indonesia.

*Corresponding author: julitayanti@gmail.com.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION

Acute subdural hematoma (SDH) is a major problem in traumatic head injury.1 Traumatic acute SDH lesion can increase intracranial pressure and is usually accompanied by diffuse injury, contusion, and edema. On Computed Tomography (CT) scan imaging, SDH can be seen as an extra-axial hyperdense

lesion, crescents between brain parenchyma and the duramater.2 Managements of traumatic acute SDH is divided into nonoperative and operative care. Non-operative management alone is significantly correlated with a higher mortality rate compared to management with operative care.3 Meanwhile, the operative management of traumatic acute

15 | JBN (Jurnal Bedah Nasional)


SDH can be evacuated either by craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy.4

Surgical management of traumatic acute SDH states that traumatic acute SDH greater than 10 mm in thickness or more than 5 mm in midline shift on computed tomographic (CT) scan have to be evacuated surgically, for any Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score. Patients with the GCS score <9 with an SDH thickness < 10 mm and midline shift < 5 mm should undergo surgical evacuation if there is a deterioration of patients' GCS score by 2 points or more between initial assessment right after the injury and hospital admission.5 Craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy, both of which are commonly used for primary evacuation of traumatic acute SDH.4

No differences are shown between a craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy in regards to clinical and demographic data. The Decompressive craniectomy had a higher mortality rate compared to the craniotomy (23.3% vs 7.1%, p 0.04). There were no differences found in other outcomes and complications.6 Although Decompressive craniectomy has efficacy in saving patients’ life, however, it is accompanied by a myriad of fairly serious complications that have not been sufficiently highlighted in prospective clinical trials. The most common complications are bleeding, infection or inflammation, and disruption of the CSF compartment.7 The objectives of this study are to compare the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) and mortality outcomes of craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy management in traumatic acute SDH patients.

METHODS

This research is a historical cohort study conducted at the Sanglah General Hospital, Bali by collecting data from the subject's medical record. The sample inclusion criteria in this study were traumatic acute SDH

patients who have done craniotomy surgery and decompressive craniectomy for SDH evacuation according to the Neurosurgery protocol at Sanglah General Hospital, Bali from January 2018 to March 2020. The exclusion criteria in this study were patients with incomplete medical records, traumatic acute SDH non-traumatic, patients who underwent secondary decompressive craniectomy due to increased intracranial pressure, and chronic subdural hematoma. The sampling technique in this study used a consecutive sampling technique.

Based on the data collected from medical records, patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Outcomes assessed from this research are mortality and Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) score. GOSE is measured 3 months since the head injury patient receiving surgical procedures. Medical follow up on patients are conducted in addition to medical record tracing to obtain patient's mortality status (categorized into 2 groups, alive and dead) and GOSE scores. GOS Extended (GOSE) is an outcome measurement scale of the head injury that is used to state the prognosis. In this study, measurements will be assessed in the third post-traumatic month, which consists of 8 categories (Table 1).8

The data that has been collected will be processed in 2 stages, namely descriptively to determine the characteristics of the sample and bivariate analysis to compare mortality and GOSE scores between the two groups (craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy). The variables to be assessed are the type of surgery as the independent variable, mortality status, and GOSE score as the dependent variable. Other variables to be assessed are age, sex, GCS score, pupil size, SDH thickness and midline shift based on CT scan, trauma onset, duration of surgery, source of bleeding, extracranial injury, and other comorbid factors

(diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and coagulopathy). Numerical data will be presented in terms of the mean and standard deviation, while Categorical data will be presented in terms of frequency and percentage.

Table 1. Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) score and Its Clinical Interpretation8

GOSE          Clinical Interpretation

  • 1     Death: die

  • 2     Persistent vegetative state: no response to

external stimuli, unable to speak or do not follow orders, emotional behavior, spontaneous behavior that is not related to a particular event

  • 3     Lower severe disability: need help from

others almost all the time of the day

  • 4     Upper severe disability: can be left at home

alone for about 8 hours a day, but cannot travel far or go shopping without other people

  • 5     Lower moderate disability: unable to work

  • 6     Upper moderate disability: decreased

working capacity

  • 7     Lower good recovery: able to return to

normal life, but has minor problems that affect daily activities

  • 8     Upper good recovery: able to return to

normal life without any problems related to head injury that affects daily activities

Mann-Whitney test will be used. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 23.0). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Eighty subjects with traumatic acute SDH who underwent surgery were included in the study. Subjects were divided into two groups, namely subjects who underwent craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy. In Table 2, the characteristics of the research sample are described. According to this data, based on age there was craniotomy with a mean of 46.2 years (SD: 20.38) and craniectomy with a mean of 44.5 (SD: 18.8). Based on gender, 26 respondents (51%) were male with craniotomy and 25 respondents (49%) had craniectomy, while 16 respondents (40%) were female with craniectomy, and 24 (60%) respondents had craniectomy.

Based on the source of bleeding, 33 respondents (66%) of the samples with bridging vein bleeding sources were performed and craniectomy was performed as many as 17 respondents (34%), while the source of contusion bleeding with craniotomy was 7 respondents (23.3%) and 23 (76.7%) craniectomy with p-value = 0.000 (< 0.05). It was concluded that there were differences in the surgical procedures for traumatic acute SDH patients between bridging vein bleeding sources and contusions.

In Table 3, a comparative analysis of mortality has been shown between the craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy using the chi-square test. After the craniotomy procedure, the number of patients who died was 18 respondents (45%) and 22 (55%) respondents were alive. After craniectomy, 16 (40%) patients died and 24 (60%) were alive with p-value = 0.651 and RR 1 (CI: 0.67-1.87). This result shows that there is no statistically significant difference in mortality in traumatic

acute SDH patients between a craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy.

In Table 4, a comparison of GOSE scores is carried out between a craniotomy and a decompressive craniectomy. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the data because the data were not normally distributed. In patients who underwent

craniotomy, the average GOSE score was 41.39 and in patients who underwent craniectomy, the average GOSE score was 39.61 with a p-value = 0.718, which means there is no difference in GOSE scores between a craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy of traumatic acute SDH patients.

Table 2. Characteristics of Research Samples Based on Types of Surgery

Variable

Types of Surgery

p

Craniotomy

Decompressive Craniectomy

Age

46.2±20.38

44.5± 18.8

0.727

Gender

Male

26 (51%)

25 (49%)

0.816

Female

14 (48.3%)

25 (51.7%)

Head injury

Severe

16 (45.7%)

19 (54.3%)

Moderate

14 (43.8%)

18 (56.3%)

0.104

Mild

10 (76.9%)

3 (23.1%)

SDH thickness

10

25 (45.5%)

30 (54.5%)

0.228

< 10

15 (60%)

10 (40%)

Pupil reflex

Non-isochor

11 (70.8%)

13 (29.2%)

0.626

Isochor

29 (30.4%)

27 (69.6%)

Midline shift

5 mm

21 (38.2%)

34 (61.8%)

0.002

< 5 mm

19 (76%)

6 (24%)

Source of bleeding

Bridging

33 (66%)

17 (34%)

0.000

Contusion

7 (23.3%)

23 (76.7%)

Extracranial injury

Yes

6 (28.6%)

15(71.4%)

0.022

No

34 (57.6%)

25(42.4%)

Comorbid factors

Yes

15(46.9%)

17 (53.1%)

0.648

No

25 (52.1%)

23 (57.5%)

Onset of Trauma

25.3±18.9

23.5±17.4

0.661

Duration of Surgery

3.1±0.7

3.4±0.9

0.091

Table 3. Mortality comparison between craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy

Types of Surgery

Mortality Status       RR     CI 95%      p

Died        Alive

Craniotomy

Decompressive Craniectomy

18 (45%)    22 (55%)        1      0.67-1.87     0.651

16 (40%)    24 (60%)

Table 4. GOSE score comparison between craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy

Surgery                GOSE scorep*

Craniotomy41.39

Decompressive Craniectomy               39.610.718

DISCUSSION

Subdural hematoma is an accumulation of blood in the subdural cavity, which in its acute form, both blood and cerebrospinal fluid enter the space as a result of brain laceration or arachnoid tear, thereby increasing subdural pressure on direct injury to the brain.9 Since the cerebrospinal fluid-covered brain can move, while the sinus venosus is fixed, the displacement of the brain that occurs in trauma can tear several soft veins at the site where they penetrate the duramater. Massive bleeding will cause acute symptoms resembling an epidural hematoma. Most subdural hemorrhages occur in the convexity of the brain in the parietal region. A small proportion is found in the posterior fossa, interhemispheric fissure, and tentorium or between the temporal lobe and the skull base. Acute subdural hemorrhage in the interhemispheric fissure has been reported, caused by rupture of the veins running between the medial and falx hemispheres, and has also been reported as a traumatic lesion of the pericallosal artery due to head injury. Interhemispheric subdural hemorrhage will give the classic symptom of monopharesis in the lower limbs. In children, subdural hemorrhages in the posterior interhemispheric fissure and tentorium are often found due to severe shaking of the child's body (shaken baby syndrome).10

Indications for surgery in patients with traumatic acute SDH are an traumatic acute SDH with thickness > 10 mm or midline shift > 5 mm on CT scan and comatose patients (GCS < 9) with SDH thickness < 10 mm and midline shift < 5 mm who need to get surgical evacuation of the clot if the GCS score is reduced and/or the patient exhibits non-isochoric pupil and/or ICP greater than 20 mmHg.11 Craniotomy is a means to achieve the goal of temporary intracranial surgery, while decompressive Craniectomy consists of

sequentially removing pieces of skull bone to reduce intracranial pressure.12,13

Vilcinis, et al in their research stated that the decision to perform a craniectomy or craniotomy is better depending on the surgeon's preference. However, intraoperative brain swelling after ASDH evacuation is an indicator for performing a craniectomy as well.14 In the study of Woertgen, et al, the craniectomy group tended to have worse injuries than the craniotomy group. Patients undergoing craniectomy tend to have pupillary mydriasis and brain herniation.15 Li, et al in their study reported that the surgical technique was based on the preference of the surgeon. They reported that craniectomy tends to be performed in patients with cistern basal effacement and lower GCS scores.16

The results of the bivariate analysis showed that there are no significant differences between the mortality of traumatic acute SDH patients who underwent craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy. Although they are surgical procedures, such as craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy can be effective in the management of traumatic acute SDH, however, the preferred approach between the two is still controversial. Yilmas, et al showed that the mortality rate is higher among older patients and patients with a GCS score of less than 6 on arrival. The Midline shift of 10 mm or more in diameter and 15 mm in thickness of hematoma were significantly associated with a higher mortality rate. The study is also in line with the conclusion that stated decompressive craniectomy can help prevent further midline shift and is associated with a lower mortality rate in comparison with craniotomy.17 Research conducted by Phan, et al also mention that craniectomy is associated with poorer post-operative outcomes compared to craniotomy.18 In a meta-analysis conducted by Mahadewa, et al in 2020,

comparing GCS score between craniectomy and craniotomy in patients with traumatic acute subdural hematoma, revealed craniectomy had poorer clinical outcomes with a pooled risk ratio of 1.41 (95% CI: 1.061.88; p=0.02).19 The opposite conclusion was put forward by Leghani, et al in 2013. Research by Legnani, et al involving 152 patients demonstrated that performing a suboccipital craniotomy has similar effectivity and safety compared to performing a craniectomy. both sub-occipital craniotomy and craniectomy showed similar results in maintaining dural integrity. However less post-operative complications were obtained when a sub-occipital craniotomy was performed compared to craniectomy.20

The results of this study showed that there was no difference in GOSE scores between craniotomy and decompression craniectomy (p>0.05). Mezue, et al found cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy was associated with a higher complication rate, but good neurologic outcomes after surgery always outweighed the complications. Both GCS and GOSE mean scores showed significant improvement at 3 and 6 months after cranioplasty. Bone decompression is very useful in the management of head trauma. Careful selection of cases and appropriate radiological examination are utterly important and will help decide to perform craniotomy or craniectomy.21

Several limitations were found in this study. Firstly, this study did not involve multiple neurosurgery centers, so a larger sample could not be obtained. Secondly, the research is a historical cohort and fully involved the medical record system. A future study using a prospective design is expected to be carried out. Thirdly, due to incomplete medical record data, other necessary clinical data, such as the cause of death, volume of

blood loss during surgery, and the mechanism of trauma patients cannot be included.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in mortality and GOSE outcomes in traumatic acute SDH patients between those who underwent craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy. However, craniotomy should become the first choice in traumatic acute SDH management except in cases where brain edema was prominent, decompressive craniectomy should be considered.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This article is a part of the author’s thesis paper. The author would like to thank all research participants and everyone supporting the study.

DISCLOSURE

All authors have the same contribution in writing and reviewing this article. All authors express no conflict of interest in the publication of this article. This study uses selffunded funds.

REFERENCES

  • 1.    Vega RA, Valadka AB. Natural history of acute subdural hematoma. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2017;28:247-55.

  • 2.    Karibe H, Hayashi H, Hirano T, et al. Surgical management of traumatic acute subdural hematoma in adults: A Review. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2014;54:887-94.

  • 3.    Leitgeb J, Mauritz W, Brazinova A, et al. Outcome after severe brain trauma due to acute subdural hematoma. J Neurosurg. 2012;117:324-33.

  • 4.    Legnani FG, Saladino A, Casali C, et al. Craniotomy vs. craniectomy for posterior fossa tumors: A prospective study to

evaluate complications after surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013;155:2281-6.

  • 5.    Bullock R, Maas AI, Stocchetti N. Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:728-41.

  • 6.    Chen SH, Chen Y, Fang WK, et al. Comparison of craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy in severely head-injured patients with acute subdural hematoma. J Trauma. 2011;71:1632-6.

  • 7.    Kurland DB, Ghom AK, Stokum JA, et al. Complications     associated     with

decompressive craniectomy: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care. 2015;23:292-304.

  • 8.    Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM, et al. Structured interviews for the glasgow outcome scale and the extended glasgow outcome scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15:573-85.

  • 9.    Meagher RJ, Young WF. Subdural hematoma. Medscape [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 November 20]. Available from:

http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/11 37207-overview.

  • 10.    David CA, Arle JE. Trauma to the brain. In: Jones, HR, Srinivasan J, Allam GJ, et al, editors. Netter's Neurology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2012. p.552-61.

  • 11.    Osborn AG, Blaser SI, Salzman KL, et al. Diagnostic imaging brain. 1st ed. Salt Lake City, Utah: Amirsys; 2004.

  • 12.    Charles T, Michael S. Principles and practice of keyhole brain surgery. 1st ed. New York: Thieme; 2015.

  • 13.    Rossini Z, Nicolosi F, Kolias AG, et al. The history of decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury. Front Neurol. 2019;10:458.

  • 14.    Vilcinis R, Bunevicius A, Tamasauskas A. The association of surgical method with

outcomes of acute subdural hematoma patients: experience with 643 consecutive patients. World Neurosurg. 2017;101:335-42.

  • 15.    Woertgen C, Rothoerl RD, Schebesch KM, et al. Comparison of craniotomy and craniectomy in patients with acute subdural haematoma. J Clin Neurosci. 2006;13:718-21.

  • 16.    Li LM, Kolias AG, Guilfoyle MR, et al. Outcome following evacuation of acute subdural haematomas: a comparison of craniotomy    with    Decompressive

craniectomy.      Acta      Neurochir.

2012;154:1555-61.

  • 17.    Yılmaz I, Ertem DH, Kilic M, et al. Factors associated with mortality in acute subdural hematoma: Is Decompressive craniectomy effective? Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2019;25:147-53.

  • 18.    Phan K, Moore JM, Griessenauer C, et al. Craniotomy versus decompressive craniectomy for acute subdural hematoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2017;101:677-85.

  • 19.    Mahadewa TGB, Mardhika PE, Maliawan S, et al. Comparison of clinical outcome between craniectomy and craniotomy as surgical management of traumatic acute subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2020;8:137-42.

  • 20.    Legnani FG, Saladino A, Casali C, et al. Craniotomy vs. craniectomy for posterior fossa tumors: A prospective study to evaluate complications after surgery. Acta Neurochir. 2013;155:2281-6.

  • 21.    Mezue WC, Ndubuisi C, Ohaegbulam SC, et al. Cranial bony decompressions in the management of head injuries: decompressive      craniotomy      or

craniectomy?  Niger J Clin  Pract.

2013;16:343-7.

21