Authors:

Nyoman Ayu Sukma Pramestisari

Abstract:

“The complexity of the problems of poverty and social inequality in Indonesia becomes a paradox when the development that has been promoted for almost 50 years has not brought significant changes in alleviating poverty. The still high percentage of poor people in Indonesia means that welfare cannot be reached by all Indonesian people. Considering that the indicators of poverty and welfare are economic, it cannot be separated from the enactment of the current global system of neo-liberalism. This paper tries to dissect the failure of development practices in Indonesia, which in its implementation is very contrary to the principle of prioritizing the interests of the people as a result of being infected with the logic of neo-liberalism. This condition actually ends up widening social inequalities as well as perpetuating poverty. The indications are getting stronger when the government and public space seem to have become “traders” and objectify society in development cases for their interests. By using Habermas’ communicative action approach and deliberative space, he feels he is capable of being a solution to this problem in order to achieve the re-actualization of Indonesia’s development independently and based on solidarity in the interests of the nation.”

Keywords

Keyword Not Available

Downloads:

Download data is not yet available.

References

  • Badan Pusat Statistik. 2017. Persentase Penduduk Miskin 2017. https://www.bps.go.id/Brs/view/id/1379. 2 Oktober 2017 (18:30)
  • Daldjoeni. 1992. Seluk Beluk Masyarakat Kota. Bandung: Penerbit Alumni.
  • Internasional Forum On Globalization. 2001. Does Globalization Help The Poor. Terjemahan Widyamartaya dan AB Widyanta. 2003. Globalisasi Kemiskinan dan Ketimpangan. Yogyakarta: CPRC
  • Habermas. 2008. Ruang Publik: Sebuah Kajian Tentang Masyarakat Borjuis. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana
  • Hadirman, F. B. 2009. Demokrasi Deliberatif. Yogyakarta: Kanisius
  • __¬. 2017. Dalam Moncong Oligarki. Yogyakarta: Kanisius
  • Levine, D. P., & Caporaso, J. A. 2008. Teori-Teori Ekonomi Politik. Yogyakarata: Pustaka Pelajar.
  • Strahm, R.H. 1980. Uber Entwicklung-Unter entwicklung Stichworter zur Entwicklungspolitik. Berlin. Terjemahan Agus Setiadi. 1983. Yang Berlimpah dan Yang Merana. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
  • Suryani, L.D. 2017. Ternyata Ada Rencana Bisnis Wisata Tol di Atas Teluk Benoa. Mangabay Indonesia. 2 Februari. http://www.mongabay.co.id/2017/02/02/ternyata-ada-rencana-bisnis-wisata-tol-di-atas-teluk-benoa/. 2 Oktober 2017 (19:55).
  • Wibowo, I., & Wahono, F. 2003. Neoliberalisme. Yogyakarta: CPRC.

PDF:

https://jurnal.harianregional.com/d3perpus/full-98058

Published

2023-02-08

How To Cite

PRAMESTISARI, Nyoman Ayu Sukma. TELAAH KRITIS IMPLIKASI PEMBANGUNAN TERHADAP KEMISKINAN DI INDONESIA.Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 2, p. 73-77, feb. 2023. ISSN 2827-9107. Available at: https://jurnal.harianregional.com/d3perpus/id-98058. Date accessed: 02 Jun. 2025.

Citation Format

ABNT, APA, BibTeX, CBE, EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows), MLA, ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows), RefWorks, Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only), Turabian

Issue

Vol 2 No 2 (2022)

Section

Articles

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License