Advances in Tropical Biodiversity and

Environmental Sciences

6(3): 98-106, October, 2022

e-ISSN:2622-0628

DOI: 10.24843/ ATBES.2022.v06.i03.p06

Available online at: https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ATBES/article/view/93364

Diversity, Evenness, and Species Richness of Aerial Insects in Dry Land of Kefamenanu, North Central Timor, East Nusa Tenggara

Mohamad Fajar Farid Amrulloh*, Kamaluddin, Blasius Atini, Hernur Yoga Priyambodo, Maria Yasinta Moi

Biology Education, Faculty of Education, Timor University

Jl Kefamenanu KM.09, Sasi, Kefamenanu, Timor Tengah Utara, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia - 85614 *Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract. This research was conducted to determine the diversity, richness, and evenness of aerial insects based on habitat characteristics in the dry land of Kefamenanu city, North Central Timor, East Nusa Tenggara. The research was conducted on three types of habitats, namely dry land, rivers, and lakes by purposive sampling method. Sampling was done by documenting specimens in each habitat, identifying, inventorying, and analyzing quantitatively to obtain data on species diversity, species richness, and species evenness. Results revealed that aerial insects in Kefamenanu City were found in 9 orders, 25 families, 44 genera, 54 species, and 1998 individuals in three habitat types with diversity index (H'=3,068), evenness index (E=0.774), richness index (R). = 6.974), and dominance index (0.074). Aerial insects in dryland habitats are found in 8 orders, 18 families, 32 genera, 32 species, 514 individuals with diversity index (H'=2.735), evenness index (E=0.789), richness index (R=4.966), and dominance index. (0.092). Aerial insects in river habitat found 7 orders, 20 families, 40 genera, 47 species, and 792 individuals with diversity index (H'=3.205), evenness index (E=0.833), richness index (R=6.892), and dominance index (0.075). Aerial insects in the lake habitat found 8 orders, 18 families, 35 genera, 39 species, 692 individuals with diversity index (H'=2,906), evenness index (E=0.793), richness index (R=5.811), and dominance index (0.083).

Keywords: aerial insect; dry land; diversity; evenness; richness

  • I.    INTRODUCTION

Indonesia has a dry land area of 122.1 million ha, consisting of 108.8 million dry land with a wet climate, mostly located in western Indonesia, such as Sumatra and Kalimantan and 13.3 million ha of dry land with a dry climate mostly located in eastern Indonesia, such as the Nusa Tenggara region. Based on the 13.3 million ha of dry climates in Indonesia, 3 million ha are in East Nusa Tenggara, and 1.5 million ha in West Nusa Tenggara [1]. Dry land in the city of Kefamenanu forms several types of ecosystems, including dry land, rivers, lakes, and dry forests [2]. The soil structure of dry land with dry climates is mostly composed of coral rock and red soil [3], so that the use of dry land as agricultural land or fishery land has many problems and obstacles. The possible uses of this land are the construction of cisterns, dry fields, plantations, community forests, shrubs, and grasslands. The main problems in dry land are soil damage on dry land, lack of water in the dry season, lack of nutrients, and soil

conditions that are sensitive to erosion. Other problems experienced by farmers in developing agriculture in dry land include the availability of water, nutrients, and insect pests [4].

Insects included to phylum Arthropoda that have an important role in the food web, namely as pest insects, predatory insects, detrivorous insects, pollinator insects, and bioindicator insects [5]. As an insect bioindicator, it shows that the more diversity of insects in an area, the better environmental quality in the area [6]. Insects are divided into aerial insects and soil insects. Aerial insects are insects that have wings to fly, but not all insects that have wings are aerial insects [7]. The existence of aerial insects in three types of ecosystems (dry land, rivers, and lakes) is interesting to study with the hope of finding some useful insects for agriculture, can determine the diversity, evenness, richness, dominance, and similarity index as well determine the quality of the environment in Kefamenanu city, North Central Timor, East Nusa Tenggara.

  • II.    RESEARCH METHOD

The research was carried out in August-October 2022 in the dry land of the city of Kefamenanu, North Central Timor, East Nusa Tenggara. Kefamenanu dry land area consists of dry land habitat areas, rivers, and lakes. The tools used during the study included cameras, booknote research, insect nets, flakon bottles, insect envelopes, camphor, raffia string, locus, thermometer, hygrometer, altimeter, and anemometer. The research material consisted of 70% alcohol, and insects found in the field.

The method of species inventory and collection of aerial insect samples was carried out using the line transect method (8). The line transect method was carried out on insect habitat lines, namely in dry land lines, riverbank paths, and lakeside paths. The line transect method is carried out by making a 250 meter long transect line with 5 observation points with a distance of 100 meters between points. Observations were carried out for 3 times 8 hours (07.00 – 11.00 WITA & 13.00 – 17.00 WITA) in each habitat [9].

Figure 1. Types of habitat in the dry land of Kefamenanu City, TTU, NTT: A. Rivers; B. Lake; C. Dry land


The research was conducted on three types of habitats (Figure 1), namely dry land habitat, river habitat, and lake habitat using purposive sampling method. Sampling was done by taking pictures using a camera and taking aerial insect samples using a sweep net. Each individual aerial insect caught was put into an insect envelope and flakon bottle containing 70% alcohol, then labeled, and the date of the individual number, species name, fishing habitat was recorded, and for samples that were not caught and were still in the observation area only documentation was taken. to be identified immediately. The samples that have been taken are then documented for identification, inventory, classification, and quantitative data analysis. Identification was carried out using the guide book [10,11,12]. Measurement of environmental parameters was carried out on the three habitat types including air temperature (0C), light intensity (lux), humidity (%), wind speed (km/h), and altitude (mAMSL). The data analysis technique was carried out by calculating the diversity index (H'), evenness index (E), richness index (R), dominance index (C), and Similarity index (IS). Analysis of the data used above include [13]:

Diversity Index: The Species Diversity Index shows the diversity of species in the area. The species diversity index

is calculated using the Shannon-Wienner (H') formula as follows:

H' = -∑pi ln pi Pi = ni/N

Information:

H' = Shannon-Wiener diversity index

Pi = The ratio of the number of individuals of a species to the whole species

Ni' = Number of species caught

N = Total number of individuals of all species caught

The criteria for diversity index according to Michael (1995) are as follows:

If H'<1 means low insect diversity

If H'1-3 means moderate insect diversity

If H'>3 means high insect diversity

Evenness Index (E): Species abundance index is calculated using the Evenner Index formula (Odum, 1993), namely:

E=H'/LnS

Information:

E = Specific evenness index

H' = Index of species diversity

S = Number of insect species

The smaller the value of E, the narrower the distribution of species, and the greater the value of E, the wider the spread of species. The evenness index is:

If 0 < E 0.4, it means that the evenness of the species is low If 0.4 < E 0.6, it means that the evenness of the species is moderate

If 0.6 < E 1.0, it means that the evenness of the species is classified as high

Richness Index (R): The insect species richness index in this study used the Margalef Index with the following equation:

R = S-1/Ln(N)

Information:

R = Specific Richness Index

S = Number of types

Ln = Natural logarithm

N = Total number of individuals

The criteria for the value of the similar wealth index are:

If R < 3.5, it means that the species richness is low

If R = 3.5 – 5.0, it means that the species richness is classified as moderate

If R > 5.0, it means that the species richness is high

Dominance Index (C): The dominance index is a parameter that expresses the level of dominance of a species in a community. The dominance of this species can occur centrally, several species, or many species which can be estimated from the high and low dominance index.

ID = ∑ O2

Information:

C = dominance index (Simpson index)

ni = The i-th type of significant value index

N = Number of important value indexes of all types

The dominant index criteria are:

If 0 < C 0.5 means low insect dominance

If 0.5 < C 0.75 means moderate insect dominance

If 0.75 < C 1 means high insect dominance

Similarity Index: Species Similarity Index in the three research sites, the Sorensen similarity index formula was used (Odum, 1993):

IS = 2h/a+b

J = Number of the same type of insect found in both locations

a = number of insects found at location a b = number of insects found at location b The Sorensen similarity index is as follows: If S > 50% then the area has the same

If S < 50% then the area has no similarities.

  • III.    RESULT AND DICUSSION

Result

Aerial insects were found in three habitat types (dry land, rivers, and lakes) in the city of Kefamenanu, North Central Timor, East Nusa Tenggara as many as 1998 individuals belonging to 54 species, 44 genera, 25 families, and 9 orders. All the orders found were the orders Coleoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Isoptera, Lepidoptera, Neuroptera, Odonata, & Orthoptera (Table 1). Several aerial insect species from each order have been successfully documented as evidence of insect presence in the dry land of Kefamenanu city, North Central Timor, East Nusa Tenggara (Figure 2).

Documentation results of several aerial insect species found in dry land habitats, rivers, and lakes in the city of Kefamenanu, North Central Timor, East Nusa Tenggara, including those from the order Neuroptera; Creoleon plumbens (Fig. 2A), order Orthoptera; Caelifera sp (Figure 2B), order Hymenoptera; Apis cerana (Fig. 2C), order Odonata; Pseudagrion pilidorsum (Fig. 2D), order Lepidoptera; Danaus chrysippus (Fig. 2E), and the order Hemiptera; Leptoglossus lonchoides (Fig. 2F). The documentation process was carried out by euthanasia using 70% alcohol, and with direct documentation in the field.

TABLE I

AERIAL INSECTS WAS FOUND IN THE THREE HABITAT TYPES IN THE DRY LAND OF KEFAMENANU CITY, TTU, NTT

No.

Order dan Family

Genera atau Species

Number of Individuals

Total

Number

Role

Dryland

River

Lake

1

Coleoptera Carabidae

Rhynchophorus sp

4

0

2

6

Predator

2

Chrysomelidae

Charidotella secpunctata

0

11

0

11

Predator

3

Coccinelidae

Coccinella septempunctata

11

0

1

12

Predator

4

Diptera

Anthomyiidae

Adia cinerella

1

0

5

6

Pest

Advances in Tropical Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences 6(3): 98-106, October, 2022              e-ISSN:2622-0628

DOI: 10.24843/ATBES. 2022.v06.i03.p06 Available online at: https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ATBES/article/view/93364

101

5

Culicidae

Aedes sp

23

28

23

74

Predator

6

Muscidae

Musca domestica

9

9

13

31

Pest

7

Muscidae

Hemiptera

Musca autumnalis

0

1

1

2

Pest

8

Alydidae

Riptortus sp

0

2

4

6

Pest

9

Coreidae

Leptoglossus lonchoides

0

38

0

38

Pest

10

Reduviidae

Hymenoptera

Polytoxus fuscovittatus

0

3

4

7

Pest

11

Apidae

Apis cerana

10

13

10

33

Pest

12

Apidae

Xylocopa sp

3

5

0

8

Pest

13

Vespidae

Isoptera

Vespa affinis

0

1

6

7

Pest

14

Rhinotermitidae

Lepidoptera

Coptotermes curvignathus

45

0

2

47

Predator

15

Hesperidae

Taratrocera sp

3

4

18

25

Pest

16

Lycanidae

Zizina otis

31

47

41

119

Pest

17

Nymphalidae

Acraea violae

26

35

24

85

Pest

18

Nymphalidae

Danaus chrysippus

13

36

31

80

Pest

19

Nymphalidae

Elymnias hypermenestrata

8

11

4

23

Pest

20

Nymphalidae

Hypolimnas bolina

2

3

1

6

Pest

21

Nymphalidae

Ideopsis juventa

1

1

1

3

Pest

22

Nymphalidae

Junonia orithya

1

2

1

4

Pest

23

Nymphalidae

Junonia iphita

0

10

0

10

Pest

24

Nymphalidae

Junonia atlites

0

1

0

1

Pest

25

Nymphalidae

Neptis hylas

6

11

12

29

Pest

26

Nymphalidae

Phalanta phalanta

2

0

1

3

Pest

27

Nymphalidae

Ypthima baldus

11

8

3

22

Pest

28

Papilionidae

Graphium doson

1

2

0

3

Pest

29

Pieridae

Catopsilia pomona

37

49

42

128

Pest

30

Pieridae

Eurema blanda

18

15

17

50

Pest

31

Pieridae

Neuroptera

Leptosia nina

6

14

11

31

Pest

32

Myrmeleontidae Odonata

Creoleon plumbeus

1

0

0

1

33

Chlorocyphidae

Libellago lineata

0

3

0

3

Predator

34

Coenagrionidae

Agriocnemis pygmaea

0

2

0

2

Predator

35

Coenagrionidae

Ischnura senegalensis

0

17

4

21

Predator

36

Coenagrionidae

Pseudagrion microcephalum

0

2

0

2

Predator

37

Coenagrionidae

Pseudagrion pilidorsum

0

2

0

2

Predator

38

Coenagrionidae

Pseudagrion pruinosum

0

4

0

4

Predator

39

Libelluidae

Brachytemis contaminata

0

27

28

55

Predator

40

Libelluidae

Crocothemis servilia

5

24

9

38

Predator

41

Libelluidae

Diplacodes trivialis

17

20

25

62

Predator

42

Libelluidae

Neurothemis ramburii

0

7

10

17

Predator

43

Libelluidae

Neurothemis terminata

0

6

4

10

Predator

44

Libelluidae

Orthetrum pruinosum

0

0

8

8

Predator

45

Libelluidae

Orthetrum sabina

60

59

78

197

Predator

46

Libelluidae

Orthetrum testaceum

0

12

15

27

Predator

47

Libelluidae

Pantala flavenscens

37

143

109

289

Predator

48

Libelluidae

Potamarcha congener

3

3

3

9

Predator

49

Libelluidae

Tholymis tillarga

0

1

1

2

Predator

50

Libelluidae

Zyxoma obtusum

0

1

1

2

Predator

51

Platycnemididae

Copera marginipes

0

2

0

2

Predator

Orthoptera

52

Acrididae

Caelifera sp

111

93

113

317

Pest

53

Gryllidae

Acheta domesticus

6

3

5

14

Pest

54

Mantidae

Mantis sp

2

1

1

4

Pest

Figure 2. Aerial insects found on dry land in the city of Kefamenanu, TTU, NTT: A. Creoleon plumbeus (Neuroptera); B. Caelifera sp (Orthoptera); C. Apis cerana (Hymenoptera); D. Pseudagrion pilidorsum (Odonata); E. Danaus chrysippus (Lepidoptera); F. Leptoglossus lonchoides (Hemiptera).


The results showed the number of individuals and the number of species in each habitat type were 514 individuals, 32 species (dry land), 792 individuals, 47 species (rivers), and 692 individuals, 39 species (lakes). The results were analyzed quantitatively by calculating the diversity index (H'), evenness index (E), wealth index (R), dominance index (ID), and Similarity index (IS). The species diversity index (H') of aerial insects in three habitat types in the city of Kefamenanu, North Central Timor, East

Nusa Tenggara is high (3,086>3). The distribution of species (E) of aerial insects in three habitat types in Kota Kefamenanu, North Central Timor, East Nusa Tenggara was high (0.6<0.774=<1.0). Species richness (R) of aerial insects in three habitat types in Kota Kefamenanu, North Central Timor, East Nusa Tenggara was high (6,974>5.0). The dominance (ID) of aerial insects in three habitat types in the city of Kefamenanu, North Central Timor, East Nusa Tenggara was low (0<0.074=<0.5).

TABLE II

AERIAL INSECT DIVERSITY INDEX ON DRY LAND IN KEFAMENANU CITY, TTU, NTT.

Habitat

No.

Parameter                                                       Total Number

Dry Land      River      Lake

1

2

3

4

Number of Individuals                             514           792         692            1998

Number of Species                               32           47         39             54

Diversity Index (H’)                                2,735          3,205        2,906            3,086

Evenness Index (E)                                 0,789          0,833        0,793            0,774

5

6

Richness Index (R)                                 4,966          6,892        5,811            6,974

Dominance Index (ID)                             0,092         0,075       0,083           0,074

Similarity index (IS) of aerial insects on dry land and rivers (73%>50%), which means aerial insects on dry land

and rivers are relatively similar. Similarity index (IS) of aerial insects on dry land and lakes (86%>50%) which

means that aerial insects on dry land and lakes are relatively similar. Similarity index (IS) of aerial insects in rivers and lakes (81%>50%), which means that aerial insects in rivers and lakes are relatively similar. Similarity

index (IS) of aerial insects on dry land, rivers and lakes (44%>50%), which means aerial insects on dry land, rivers, and lakes are classified as non-similar.

TABLE III

AERIAL INSECT SIMILARITY INDEX IN THE THREE HABITAT TYPES IN THE DRY LAND OF KEFAMENANU CITY, TTU, NTT.

No.

Parameter

Dry land -River

Dryland -Lake

River - Lake

Dry land – River -Lake

1

Number of species A + B

79

71

86

118

2

Number of same species

26

29

35

24

3

Similarity Index (IS)

0.658 (66%)

0.817 (81%)

0.814 (81%)

0.407(41%)

The results of the calculation of the diversity index, evenness index, richness index, and aerial insect dominance index are influenced by environmental parameters (air temperature, water temperature, light intensity, humidity, wind speed, and altitude). The measurement results of environmental parameters show the air temperature in dry land (260C - 340C), rivers (200C

- 320C), and lakes (220C - 330C). Light intensity on dry land (702 lux), rivers (509 lux), and lakes (588 lux). Air humidity on dry land (47% - 20%), rivers (60% - 29%), and lakes (55% - 24%). Wind speed on dry land (10.5 km/h), rivers (8.2 km/h), and lakes (25.6 km/h). Altitude on dry land (482 mASML), rivers (345 mAMSL), and lakes (482 mAMSL).

TABLE IV

ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS OF THE THREE HABITAT TYPES IN THE DRY LAND OF KEFAMENANU CITY, TTU, NTT.

Parameter

No    Habitat

Temperature  Light Intensity   Humidity (%)    Wind      Altitude     Coordinate

(0C)           (lux)                         Velocity    (mAMSL)        point

(km/h)

1    Dry land

26 – 34          702         47% - 20%       10,5         482      9029’23”S –

124030’58”E

2    River

20 – 32          509         60% - 29%       8.2          345      9029’46”S –

124030’38”E

3    Lake

22 – 33          588         55% - 24%       25.6         403      9027’22”S –

124032’45”E

Discussion

Aerial insects found in the dry land of Kefamenanu City, North Central Timor, East Nusa Tenggara were as many as 1998 individuals, 54 species, 44 genera, 25 families, 9 orders spread over three types of habitats, including dryland habitat, river and lake habitat. (Table 1). The highest number of individual species found in the three habitat types was Caelifera sp (wood locust) with 317 individuals (Table 1). The family with the highest number of individuals found in the three habitat types was the libelluidae family, which was 725 individuals. The family with the highest number of species found in the three habitat types is the libelluidae family, which is 12 species. The number of families found in the dry land of Kefamenanu, North Central Timor Regency is greater than that found by Aveludoni (2021) in Maubeli Village, North Central Timor Regency, which reported 405 individuals, and 8 families of aerial insect [4].

Aerial insects found in dry land habitats were 514 individuals, 32 species, 32 genera, 18 families, and 8

orders. The 8 orders found in dry land habitats are the orders coleoptera, diptera, hymenoptera, isoptera, lepidoptera, neuroptera, odonata, and orthoptera. The species with the highest number of individuals found in dry land was Caelifera sp (wood locust) with 111 individuals. The family with the highest number of individuals found in dry land was the libelluidae family, which was 122 individuals. The family with the highest number of species found in dry land is the nymphalidae family, which is 9 species. Aerial insects found in river habitats were 792 individuals, 47 species, 40 genera, 20 families, and 7 orders. The 7 orders found in river habitats are the orders coleoptera, diptera, hemiptera, hymenoptera, lepidoptera, odonata, and orthoptera. The species with the highest number of individuals found in the river was Pantala flavescens (traveling dragonflies) with 143 individuals. The family with the highest number of individuals found in the river was the family libelluidae, which was 303 individuals. The family with the highest number of species found in rivers is the libelluidae family, which is 11

species. Aerial insects found in the lake habitat were 692 individuals, 39 species, 35 genera, 18 families, and 8 orders. The 8 orders found in the lake habitat are the orders coleoptera, diptera, hemiptera, hymenoptera, isoptera, lepidoptera, odonata, and orthoptera. The species with the highest number of individuals found in the lake was Caelifera sp (wood locust) with 113 individuals. The family with the highest number of individuals found in the lake is the libelluidae family, which is 300 individuals. The family with the most number of species found in the lake is the family libelluidae, which is 11 species. Acrididae and libelluidae are families of the insecta class that have a high tolerance for changes in environmental conditions, including polluted water conditions [15].

Based on the three habitat types, it was shown that the least number of insect species found was in dry land habitat (32 species), followed by lake habitat (39 species) and river habitat (49 species). The least number of insect individuals found was in dry land habitat (514 individuals), followed by lake habitat (692 individuals) and the highest number was found in river habitat (792 individuals). The most common species found in rivers are in the order Odonata suborder zygoptera (needle dragonflies). This dragonfly has a limited distribution in a habitat because of the nature of the needle dragonfly which has a high sensitivity to environmental changes. Needle dragonflies will not be found in forests that have been disturbed or have been converted [16]. The presence of dragonflies in a habitat can indicate the condition of a habitat is still classified as good or has been damaged, the presence of this abundant and diverse dragonfly can be used as one of the bioindicators of water quality [17].

The Shanno-Wiener (H') species diversity index of aerial insects in the dry land of Kefamenanu City is 3,068. These results indicate that the diversity of aerial insects in the dry land of Kefamenanu City is relatively high (3.68>3). The Shanno-Wiener (H') species diversity index of aerial insects in dry land habitats is 2,735. These results indicate that the diversity of aerial insects in dry land habitats is moderate (1<2,735<3). The Shanno-Wiener (H') species diversity index of aerial insects in river habitats is 3,205. These results indicate that the diversity of aerial insects in river habitats is high (3,205>3). The Shanno-Wiener (H') species diversity index of aerial insects in lake habitat is 2,906. These results indicate that the diversity of aerial insects in this lake habitat is moderate (1<2,906<3). The species evenness index (E) of aerial insects in the dry land of Kefamenanu City was 0.774. These results indicate that the distribution of aerial insects in the dry land of Kefamenanu City is relatively high (0.6<0.774≤1.0). The species evenness index (E) of aerial insects in dry land habitats was 0.789. These results indicate that the distribution of aerial insects in dry land

habitats is high (0.6<0.789<1.0). The species evenness index (E) of aerial insects in river habitats was 0.833. These results indicate that the distribution of aerial insects in river habitats is high (0.6<0.833<1.0). The species evenness index (E) of aerial insects in the lake habitat was 0.793. These results indicate that the distribution of aerial insects in this lake habitat is high (0.6<0.793<1.0).

The species richness index (R) of aerial insects in the dry land of Kefamenanu City is 6.974. These results indicate that the abundance of aerial insects in the dry land of Kefamenanu City is relatively high (6,974>5.0). The species richness index (R) of aerial insects in dry land habitat was 4.966. These results indicate that the richness of aerial insects in dry land habitats is relatively high (3.5 < 4.966 < 5.0). The species richness index (R) of aerial insects in river habitat was 6.892. These results indicate that the richness of aerial insects in river habitats is high (6,892>5.0). The species richness index (R) of aerial insects in the lake habitat was 5.811. These results indicate that the richness of aerial insects in this lake habitat is relatively high (5,811>5.0). Species diversity (H'), species evenness (E), and species richness (R) of aerial insects were highest in river habitats followed by species diversity (H'), species evenness (E), and species richness (R) of aerial insects in lake habitat and dry land habitat. This is related to the number of individuals and the number of species most commonly found are aerial insects in river habitats. Most of the species found in river habitats are the order Odonata and the order Lepidoptera. This is probably due to the availability of good enough food, the carrying capacity of the environment to meet the needs of aerial insects is still quite good, productivity is quite good, ecological pressure is low, and ecosystem conditions are quite balanced [18].

The species dominance index (ID) of aerial insects in the dry land of Kefamenanu City is 0.074. These results indicate that the dominance of aerial insects in the dry land of Kefamenanu City is low (0<0.074≤0.5). The species dominance index (ID) of aerial insects in dry land habitats was 0.092. These results indicate that the dominance of aerial insects in dry land habitats is low (0<0.092≤0.5). The species dominance index (ID) of aerial insects in river habitat is 0.075. These results indicate that the dominance of aerial insects in river habitats is low (0<0.075≤0.5). The species dominance index (ID) of aerial insects in lake habitat is 0.083. These results indicate that the dominance of aerial insects in this lake habitat is low (0<0.083≤0.5). Species dominance (ID) of aerial insects in river habitat was low, followed by dominance of species (ID) of aerial insects in lake and dry land habitats. The dominant insects in the three habitat types were Caelifera sp (wood grasshopper) 317 individuals, Pantala flavescens (travel dragonfly) 289 individuals, and Orthetrum sabina (green

sambar dragonfly) 197 individuals. Species that dominate the three habitat types are species that have a solitary character with a wide distribution and have a fairly high tolerance for changes in environmental conditions [19].

The value of the dominance index (ID) is inversely proportional to the value of the diversity index (H'), the species evenness index (E), and the species richness index (R). The higher the dominance of a species, the lower the diversity, evenness, and richness of a species and the lower the dominance of the species, the higher the diversity, evenness, and richness of a species in a habitat. The greater the number of individuals in one species found in a habitat, the greater the dominance index that will be obtained in that habitat. The greater the number of species found in a habitat, the greater the value of the diversity index (H'), the species evenness index (E), and the species richness index (R) in that habitat. This is influenced by several internal factors such as ecosystem balance, food availability, and stable environmental conditions. In addition, the diversity index (H'), species evenness index (E), and species richness index (R) are influenced by external factors such as humidity, air temperature, light intensity, wind speed, and altitude [20].

Similarity index (IS) of aerial insects on dry land and rivers (66%>50%), which means aerial insects on dry land and rivers are relatively similar. Similarity index (IS) of aerial insects on dry land and lakes (81%>50%) means that aerial insects on dry land and lakes are relatively similar. Similarity index (IS) of aerial insects in rivers and lakes (81%>50%), which means that aerial insects in rivers and lakes are relatively similar. Similarity index (IS) of aerial insects on dry land, rivers and lakes (41% <50%), which means that aerial insects on dry land, rivers, and lakes are classified as non-similar. The species found similarity on dry land and rivers were 26 species, consisting of the order diptera (2 species), hymenoptera (2 species), lepidoptera (14 species), odonata (5 species), and orthoptera (3 species). Species found similarity in dry land and lakes were 29 species, consisting of the order Coleoptera (2 species), Diptera (3 species), Hymenoptera (2 species), Isoptera (1 species), Lepidoptera (14 species), Odonata (12 species). species), and orthoptera (3 species). The species found similarity in rivers and lakes were 35 species, consisting of the order diptera (3 species), hemiptera (2 species), hymenoptera (2 species), lepidoptera (14 species), odonata (5 species), and orthoptera (3 species). species). The species found similarity in dry land, rivers, and lakes were 24 species, consisting of the order Diptera (2 species), Hymenoptera (1 species), Lepidoptera (13 species), Odonata (5 species), and orthoptera (3 species). The species similarity index in dry land habitats, rivers and lakes is dominated by the orders Lepidoptera and Orthoptera, this is due to the role of these two orders in the

food chain as producers, in addition to the high tolerance level of the orders Orthoptera and Lepidoptera in dry land ecosystems [21].

The results of the calculation of the diversity index, evenness index, richness index, and high aerial insect dominance index in three types of habitats in Kefamenanu City are influenced by environmental parameters. The environmental conditions of dry land habitats have dense weed vegetation, sparse tree plants, the air temperature is quite hot, the humidity is quite low, the forest floor is covered with dry grass and dry leaf litter, minimal water sources, temperature 280-320C, alkaline pH, calcareous rocky substrate, and red soil structure. The environmental conditions of the river habitat have dense weed vegetation, rare tree plants, the air temperature is cooler than dry land habitats, moderate humidity, the forest floor is covered with dry grass, wet grass, and dry leaf litter, near water sources, temperature 260-290C, alkaline pH, calcareous rocky substrate, red soil structure, and muddy riverbanks. The environmental conditions of the lake habitat have sandalwood tree vegetation, agricultural land, the air temperature is cooler than dry land habitats, moderate humidity, the lakeside floor is covered with wet grass, near water sources, temperature 260-290C, alkaline pH, and wet soil structure is given additional soil humus (2,22,23).

  • IV.    CONCLUSION

Aerial insects found on dry land in Kefamenanu City contained 9 orders, 25 families, 44 genera, 54 species, 1998 individuals in three habitat types with diversity index (H'=3,068), evenness index (E=0.774), richness index (R = 6.974), and the dominance index (0.074). Aerial insects in dry land habitat were found in 8 orders, 18 families, 32 genera, 32 species, 514 individuals with diversity index (H'=2.735), evenness index (E=0.789), richness index (R=4.966), and dominance index. (0.092). Aerial insects in river habitats were found in 7 orders, 20 families, 40 genera, 47 species, 792 individuals with diversity index (H'=3.205), evenness index (E=0.833), richness index (R=6.892), and dominance index (0.075). Aerial insects in lake habitat found 8 orders, 18 families, 35 genera, 39 species, 692 individuals with diversity index (H'=2,906), evenness index (E=0.793), richness index (R=5.811), and dominance index (0.083).

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We would like to thank the Integrated Biology Education Laboratory, Timor University, Kefamenanu.

REFERENCE

  • [1]    Mulyani, A., Nursyamsi, D., & Las, I. 2014.

Percepatan Pengembangan Pertanian Lahan Kering

Iklim Kering di Nusa Tenggara. Pengembangan Inovasi Pertanian. Vol 7 (4): 187-198

  • [2]    Suwardji. 2005. Ekologi Lahan Kering. Mataram University Press

  • [3]    Tarmizi & Suwardji. Nd. Keanekaragaman Hayati pada Wilayah Lahan Kering. Pusat Penlitian dan Pengembangan Lahan Kering Tropika – Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Mataram. Mataram

  • [4]    Aveludoni, M. M. 2021. Keanekaragaman Jenis Serangga di Berbagai Lahan Pertanian Kelurahan Maubeli Kabupaten Timor Tengah Utara. Jurnal Biologi dan Pembelajarannya. Vol 13 (1): 11-18

  • [5]    Sidabutar, V. Marheni, & Lubis, L. 2017. Indeks Keanekaragaman Jenis Serangga pada Fase Vegetatif dan Generatif Tanaman Kedelai (Glycine maxMerill) di Lapangan. Jurnal Online Agroekoteknologi. Vol 5. No 2: 474-483

  • [6]    Hadi, H.M., Udi, T., Rully, R. 2009. Biologi Insekta Entomologi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu

  • [7]    Hidayanti, F.K.N. 2016. Keanekaragaman Serangga Aerial pada Arboretum Sumber Brantas dan Lahan Pertanian Kentang Kecamatan Bumiaji Kota Batu. Skripsi. UIN Malang. Malang

  • [8]    Khoiriah, S. & Falahudin, I., 2020. Identifikasi

Serangga Aerial Lahan Gambut Pasca Kebakaran di Kawasan Revegetasi (HPT) Pedamaran Kayuagung OKI. Prosiding Seminar Nasional. Vol 3(1): 524-530

  • [9]    Swift, M.S., J. Vandermer, P.S. Ramakrishnan, J.M. Anderson, C.K. Ong & B.A. Hawkins. 1996. Biodiversity and agroecosystem function, dalam Functional Roles of Biodiversity: A Global Perspective. Ed. H.A. Mooney. John Wiley & Sons, New York. pp.261-298

  • [10]    Nafisah, N.A. dan Amrulloh, Muhammad F.F. 2017. Biodiversitas UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta (Capung). Yogyakarta: Suka Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga

  • [11]    Putra, Dis S.E. dan Siregar, Yusni L. 2017. Biodiversitas UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta (Kupu-kupu). Yogyakarta: Suka Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga

  • [12]    Kanisius. 1991. Kunci Determinasi Serangga -Program Nasional Pelatihan dan Pengembangan

Pengendalian Hama Terpadu. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.

  • [13]    Tustiyani, I., Utami, V.F., & Tauhid, A. 2020.

Identifikasi Keanekaragaman dan Dominansi Serangga pada Tanaman Bunga Matahari (Heliantus annuus L.) dengan Teknik Yellow Trap. Agritrop. 18(1): 88-97

  • [14]    Odum, E.P. 1993. Dasar-dasar Ekologi, Edisi Ketiga. Tjahjono Pacific. Aquat. Living Resour.5:107-114

  • [15]    Rahadi WS, Feriwibisono B, Nugrahani MP, et al. 2013. Naga Terbang Wendit, Keanekaragaman Capung Perairan Wendit, Malang, Jawa Timur. Indonesia Dragonfly Society, Malang.

  • [16]    Dolný A, Bárta D, Lhota S, Rusdianto, Drozd P (2011) Dragonflies (Odonata) in the Bornean rain forest as indicators of changes in biodiversity resulting from forest modification and destruction. Tropical Zoology 24: 63-86

  • [17]    Wakhid, Konen, R., Tallei, T., Maabuat, P.V. 2014. Kelimpahan Populasi Capung Jarum (Zygoptera) di Kawasan Taman Nasional Bogani Nani Wartabone, Sulawesi Utara. FMIPA. Universitas Sam Ratulangi

  • [18]    Magurran AE. 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurements. Chapman and Hall, London.

  • [19]    Susanti S. 1998. Seri Panduan Lapangan Mengenal Capung. Puslitbang Biologi-LIPI, Bogor

  • [20]    Pamungkas, D.W. & Ridwan, M. 2015. Keragaman jenis capung dan capung jarum (odonata) di beberapa sumber air di Magetan, Jawa timur. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Masyarakat Biodiversitas Indonesia. Vol 1 (6): 1295-1301

  • [21]    Siregar, A.S., Bakti, D.,  & Zahara, F. 2014.

Keanekaragaman Jenis Serangga di Berbagai Tipe Lahan Danau. Jurnal Online Agroekoteknologi. Vol 2, No. 4: 1640 - 1647

  • [22]    Leba, G.V., Koneri, R.,  & Papu, A. 2013.

Keanekaragaman Serangga Air di Sungai Pajowa Kabupaten Minahasa, Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal MIPA Unsrat Online 2 (2): 73-78

  • [23]    Rubani, A. 2020. Keanekaragaman Serangga Aerial Semak Area Perdanauan Dusun Dadapan, Kecamatan Srono, Kabupaten Banyuwangi. UIN Malang. Malang.