Authors:

Erfan Agusfiandifutra, Akram Akram, Endar Pituringsih

Abstract:

“The aim of this research is to examine the influence of Commitment Making Officer Competency (PPK), Quality of Internal Control System (SPI) and Conflict of Interest on Goods & Services Procurement Fraud (PBJ) with Performance Accountability as moderator. The research was conducted at 40 regional apparatus organizations of the NTB provincial government with a sample of 107 respondents. Hypothesis testing uses a multiple linear regression model, namely Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). The test results show that PPK Competence and SPI Quality have a negative effect on PBJ Fraud while Conflict of Interest has no effect on PBJ Fraud. This study found that PPK competence strengthens and SPI quality weakens the effect of Performance Accountability on PBJ Fraud, but Conflict of Interest has no effect on PBJ fraud which is moderated by Performance Accountability. Keywords: Fraud in Procurement of Goods/Services, Commitment Making Officers (PPK), Internal Control System (SPI), Conflicts of Interest, Performance Accountability”

Keywords

Fraud in Procurement of Goods/Services, Commitment Making Officers (PPK), Internal Control System (SPI), Conflicts of Interest, Performance Accountability

Downloads:

Download data is not yet available.

References

  • Ahyaruddin, M., & Amrillah, M. F. (2018). Faktor Penentu Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2018.04.9028
  • Arifianti, R. (2015). Fraud Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pada Pemerintah Provinsi Ntb: Pengujian Karakteristik Pokja Ulp/ Pejabat Pengadaan, Kesesuaian Kompensasi Dan Sistem Pengendalian Intern.
  • Ariani, & Ketut Salasmi. (2014). Analisis Pengaruh Moralitas Individu, Asimetri Informasi dan Keefektifan Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Kecendrungan Kecurangan Akuntansi. Bali Jurnal, 2(1).
  • Authority, N. F. (2011). Procurement fraud in the public sector.
  • Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021, February). Ekonomi Indonesia 2020 Turun sebesar 2,07 Persen (c-to-c).
  • Betham, A. A. A., Hipan, N., & Fality, F. (2019). Analisis Yuridis Prosedur Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Serta Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Pengadaan Barang/Jasa. In Jurnal Yustisiabel Fakultas Hukum (Vol. 3). https://radarkediri.jawapos.com
  • Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
  • Bramero Kurniawan Rugu, Y., & Malangkucecwara, S. (2022). Analisis Sistem Pengendalian Internal Dan Kompetensi Sumber Daya Manusia Dalam Mencegah Accounting Fraud Dengan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Pajak. http://jurnal.stie-aas.ac.id/index.php/jap
  • Caiden, G. E. (1988). The Vitality of Administrative Reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 54(3), 331–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/002085238805400301
  • Cheng, Y., Canuto, V. M., & Howard, A. M. (2001). An Improved Model for the Turbulent PBL. Journal Of The Atmospheric Sciences.
  • Crowe, H. (2011). Putting the Freud in Fraud: Why the Fraud Triangle Is No Longer Enough. In IN Howart, Crowe.
  • Dwiyanto Nurlukman, A. (2017). e-Procurement: Inovasi Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan dalam Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Berbasis e-Government di Indonesia.
  • Fithriani, N., Pituringsih, E., & Firmansyah, M. (2020). Influence of Organizational Characteristics, Compatibility Compensation, Internal Control Systems and Ethical Culture of Goods / Services Procurement Fraud. 1843–1856.
  • Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25.
  • Greiling, D., & Arie Halachmi. (2013). Accountability and Organizational Learning in the Public Sector. https://doi.org/10.2307/23484747
  • Hidayati, N., & Mulyadi, J. M. V. (2017). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Fraud Dalam Kegiatan Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Perpajakan (JRAP), 4(02), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.35838/jrap.v4i02.201
  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  • Larasati, Y. S., & Surtikanti. (2019). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud Di Dalam Proses Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa (Riset Empiris Pada Direktorat Jenderal Pengelolaan Ruang Laut Kementerian Kelautan Dan Perikanan). JAFTA, 1, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.31845/jwk.v21i2.133
  • Lestari, N. K. L., & Supadmi, N. L. (2017). Pengaruh Pengendalian Internal, Integritas dan Asimetri Informasi pada Kecurangan Akuntansi. Akuntansi, 21(1), 389–417.
  • Mardiasmo. (2018). Perpajakan Edisi Terbaru 2018. CV. Andi Offset.
  • Mentta, T., & Maldaye, M. (2020). Transparency in Public Procurement: The Case of Federal Public Organizations of Ethiopia. International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research, 4, 3–10. www.ijeais.org/ijamr
  • Najahningrum. Anik Fatun. (2013). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Fraud: Persepsi Pegawai Dinas Provinsi Diy. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/aaj
  • Narsha, Niluh Putu Dian Rosalina Handayani, & Isnalita Isnalita. (2017). Sak Etap Sebagai Solusi Overload Standar Akuntansi Bagi Umkm.” Ekuitas. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan, 44–65.
  • Nisa Nurharjanti, N. (2017). Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Fraud Pengadaan Barang/Jasa di Lembaga Publik. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Investasi, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.180284
  • OECD. (2007). Integrity in Public Procurement Good Practice from A to Z. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264027510-en
  • Prihanto, H., Murwaningsari, E., Umar, H., & Mayangsari, S. (2020). How Indonesia Attempts to Prevent Corruption! Oceanide, 12, 70–85.
  • Purwantini, A. H., & Khikmah, S. N. (2014). Pengaruh Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud Melalui Akuntabilitas Publik Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Optimum: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 4(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.12928/optimum.v4i1.7816
  • Puspitasari, M., & Lukman, R. P. (2021). Peluang Fraud Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen (PPK) atas Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintahan. Journal Conference on Economic and Business Innovation, 1(1), 1–16.
  • Schuessler, K. F. (1954). Other People’s Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. Donald R. Cressey. American Journal of Sociology, 59(6), 604–604. https://doi.org/10.1086/221475
  • Siswanto. (2010). Pengantar Manajemen. Bumi Aksara.
  • Suparman, H. E. (2014). Aspek Hukum PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH.
  • Theodorus Marten Tuanakotta. (2010). Akuntansi Forensik & Audit Investigasi.
  • Tomalili, R., Tatawu, G., & Sensu, L. (2019). Kedudukan Hukum Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Dalam Pelayanan Publik The Legal status of the Procurement of Goods and Services In the Public. 1(1), 111–122.
  • Vousinas, G. (2018). Elaborating on the Theory of Fraud. New Theoretical Extensions. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3163337
  • Wolfe, D., & Hermanson, D. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. The CPA Journal, 74, 38–42.

PDF:

https://jurnal.harianregional.com/akuntansi/full-97810

Published

2023-05-26

How To Cite

AGUSFIANDIFUTRA, Erfan; AKRAM, Akram; PITURINGSIH, Endar. Kompetensi Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen, Kualitas Sistem Pengendalian Internal, Konflik Kepentingan dan Fraud Pengadaan Barang atau Jasa.E-Jurnal Akuntansi, [S.l.], v. 33, n. 5, p. 1374-1390, may 2023. ISSN 2302-8556. Available at: https://jurnal.harianregional.com/akuntansi/id-97810. Date accessed: 08 Jul. 2024. doi:https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2023.v33.i05.p17.

Citation Format

ABNT, APA, BibTeX, CBE, EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows), MLA, ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows), RefWorks, Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only), Turabian

Issue

Vol 33 No 5 (2023)

Section

Articles

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License