Authors:

Anak Agung Ngurah Agung Kresnandra, I Wayan Gde Wahyu Purna Anggara

Abstract:

“This study aims to determine the effect of the moderating variable Manacika Parisudha on the effect of professional auditor skepticism on fraud detection. To achieve the research objectives, primary data was collected through the distribution of questionnaires that had passed the instrument test with 60 respondents holding internal supervisory positions such as internal auditors, accountants and taxation. This research uses quota sampling method. The hypothesis was tested using Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). The results found that Auditor Professional Skepticism had a positive and significant effect on Fraud Detection¸ and Manacika Parisudha did not strengthen the positive influence of Professional Auditor Skepticism on Fraud Detection. Keywords: Auditor’s Professional Skepticism; Manacika Parisudha; Fraud Detection.”

Keywords

Auditor’s Professional Skepticism; Manacika Parisudha; Fraud Detection.

Downloads:

Download data is not yet available.

References

  • Biksa, I. A. I., & Wiratmaja, I. D. N. (2016). Pengaruh Pengalaman, Indepedensi, Skeptisme Profesional Auditor Pada Pendeteksian Kecurangan. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 17(3), 2384–2415. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Akuntansi/article/view/24873
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1991). The Influence of Attitudes on Behavior. The Handbook of Attitudes, 173–222.
  • Fitriana, R., Nasution, D., & Amyel, A. (2020). Pengaruh Konten Travel Blogger Terhadap Kunjungan Wisatawan Domestik Ke Sumbawa. Lontar: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 8(1). https://doi.org/doi.org/10.30656/lontar.v8i1.2086
  • Govindarajan, V. (1986). Impact of Participation in the Budgetary Process on Managerial Attitudes and Performance: Universalistic and Contingency Perspectives. Decision Sciences, 17(4), 496–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1986.tb00240.x
  • Hartan, T. H., & Waluyo, I. (2016). Pengaruh Skeptisme Profesional, Independensi Dan Kompetensi terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Mendeteksi Kecurangan (Studi Empirispada Inspektorat Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta). Profita : Kajian Ilmu Akuntasni, 4(3). http://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/profita/article/view/5626
  • Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
  • Indrayani, P. S., Arini, N. W., & Rati, N. W. (2014). Pengaruh Skeptisme Profesional, Independensi Dan Kompetensi Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Mendeteksi Kecurangan (Studi Empiris Pada Inspektorat Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta). Jurnal Mimbar PGSD, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v2i1.2545
  • Lovita, L. (2016). Pengaruh Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Mendeteksi Kecurangan (Studi Pada Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Perwakilan DIY). UAJN’s Library, 1–15. https://doi.org/http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/id/eprint/10317
  • Manuari, I. A. R., Mimba, N. P. S. H., & Dwirandra, A. A. N. B. (2018). The Effect Of Love Of Money On Ethics With Manacika Parisudha As Moderating Variables. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Managemen, VI(8), 355–375. http://www.ijecm.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/6824.pdf
  • Mokoagouw, M., Kalangi, L., & Gerungai, N. (2018). Pengaruh Skeptisme Profesional dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Eksternal Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan (Survei Pada Auditor BPK RI Perwakilan Sulawesi Utara. Going Concern: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 13(2), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.32400/gc.13.02.19267.2018
  • Purwanti, I. G. A. P. D. S., & Astika, I. B. P. (2017). Pengaruh Auditor’s Professional Skepticism, Red Flags, Beban Kerja Pada Kemampuan Auditor dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan (Studi Empiris pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Provinsi Bali). E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2017.v21.i02.p11
  • Rachman, A. (2017). Pengaruh Etika Profesi,Skeptisisme Profesional, dan Pengalaman Kerja terhadap Kemampuan Mendeteksi Kecurangan Pada Auditor Internal Pemerintah [Universitas Lampung]. https://docplayer.info/67027955-Pengaruh-etika-profesi-skeptisisme-profesional-dan-pengalaman-kerja-terhadap-kemampuan-mendeteksi-fraud-pada-auditor-internal-pemerintah-skripsi.html
  • Rahmayani, L., Kamaliah, & Susilatri. (2014). Pengaruh Kemampuan Auditor, Skeptisme Profesional Auditor, Teknik Audit dan Whistleblower Terhadap Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Audit Investigasi dalam Pengungkapan Kecurangan. Jom Fekom, 1(2), 1–15. https://jom.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFEKON/article/view/3946
  • Ranu, G. A. Y. N., & Merawati, L. K. (2017). Kemampuan Mendeteksi Kecurangan Berdasarkan Skeptisme Profesional , Beban Kerja , Pengalaman Audit dan Tipe Kepribadian Auditor. JUARA: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 7(1), 79–90. https://jurnal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/JUARA/article/view/649
  • Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kulitatif. Bandung: R&D.
  • Suhardana, K. M. (2007). Tri Kaya Parisudha Bahan Kajian Untuk Berpikir Baik, Berkata Baik dan Berbuat Baik. Paramita : Surabaya.

PDF:

https://jurnal.harianregional.com/akuntansi/full-73538

Published

2021-06-26

How To Cite

AGUNG KRESNANDRA, Anak Agung Ngurah; ANGGARA, I Wayan Gde Wahyu Purna. Moderasi Manacika Parisudha terhadap Pengaruh Skeptisme Profesional pada Deteksi Kecurangan.E-Jurnal Akuntansi, [S.l.], v. 31, n. 6, p. 1561-1576, june 2021. ISSN 2302-8556. Available at: https://jurnal.harianregional.com/akuntansi/id-73538. Date accessed: 28 Aug. 2025. doi:https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2021.v31.i06.p17.

Citation Format

ABNT, APA, BibTeX, CBE, EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows), MLA, ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows), RefWorks, Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only), Turabian

Issue

Vol 31 No 6 (2021)

Section

Articles

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License