Komparasi Hukum Acara Pembuktian E-Arbitration di Indonesia dengan Shenzhen, Cina
on
Authors:
I Gusti Agung Ayu Gita Pritayanti Dinar
Abstract:
“Online dispute resolution (ODR) is designed to facilitate the proceedings of parties dispute through online technology media such as PCSs, laptops and cell-phones. ODR is expected to facilitate an effective mediation, adjudication communication, so it can provide benefits in the form of time and cost efficiency in dispute resolution. The research questions investigated in this study are: (i) What are the advantages of the concept of proceedings by e-arbitration? (ii) Does the e-arbitration evidence collection procedure in accordance with the evidence principles of civil procedure law? This study employs the normative legal research method. The theories applied in investigating the problems in this research are the economic-legal theory and evidence principles. Through this study, it can be determined the comparison of procedure, benefit of e-arbitration evidence regulation in ShenZhen and Indonesia.”
Keywords
Keyword Not Available
Downloads:
Download data is not yet available.
References
References Not Available
PDF:
https://jurnal.harianregional.com/actacomitas/full-66859
Published
2021-01-12
How To Cite
PRITAYANTI DINAR, I Gusti Agung Ayu Gita. Komparasi Hukum Acara Pembuktian E-Arbitration di Indonesia dengan Shenzhen, Cina.Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 3, p. 631-638, jan. 2021. ISSN 2502-7573. Available at: https://jurnal.harianregional.com/actacomitas/id-66859. Date accessed: 02 Jun. 2025. doi:https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i03.p17.
Citation Format
ABNT, APA, BibTeX, CBE, EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows), MLA, ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows), RefWorks, Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only), Turabian
Issue
Vol 5 No 3 (2020)
Section
Articles
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Discussion and feedback