The correlation between sex and additive on blood biochemistry, and gut morphometric of broiler

Avatar of jurnal
broiler

Gallusia Marhaneny Nur Isty, Danung Nur Adli

Abstract

The correlation between sex and additive on blood biochemistry, and gut morphometric of broiler was investigated. First experiment were day-old-chicks of Ross 308 placed among control and experimental. The first experiment were used 56 Ross 308 broiler with aged 35 days including 28 males and 28 females as control, and 28 males and 28 females supplemented with or without probiotics. The second experiment were used nonlinear models of Gompertz models to predict between sex and probiotic effect on the growth performance. The data analyses were uses two-way of variance between probiotic and sex (male-female). At the end experiment (35 aged d) thus probiotic and sex were significant difference (p > 0.05) on live weight (g), glucose (mg/dL), and villus height (µm). Data were statistically analyses using of SAS University version 4.0 red hat (64-bit). To sum up, the interaction between group × sex was significant for body weight (g), villus height (µm) and trends reduce amount of glucose (mg/dL) of broiler and non-linear models were effective to comparison between in vivo and predicted models

Keywords: Broiler, female, linear regression, probiotic, sex.

Full Text:

PDF

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jnt.2021.005.01.1

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

INTRODUCTION

At the quarter fourth of 2021 the price of the broiler were increasing in Indonesia. The consumption are mirroring from key consumption in Indonesia that broiler are fulfilled as a cheap protein. With regard of this condition all sector including feed sector ought to be aware of this condition (Adli et al., 2018). Consequently, the price of feed are increasing of each time. For example feed mill were always increasing start at 100,- / kg IDR. On each raw material of the feed are consisted feed additive. One additive is called probiotic. Probiotic is amount of microorganism that stimulated and do technologies engineering to support in feed. Since early of 2018 our government also following European Union to banned used of antibiotic growth promoters in feed 2018 (Adli and Sjofjan, 2020a;b;c).

Probiotic are hopefully given significant effect to growth performance of broiler. Nowadays, our researchers are do the small research when separated the sex between male and female in research. Surprisingly findings, Adli et al., (2019) if we separated the male and female sex in the research would be detailed in results. In 2022, our industries were faced into smart farming technology but the research are low when doing this research. Gompertz is one of base algorithm that can help to compared between in-vivo test (Masoudi and Azarfar, 2017). The Gompertz were statistical linear models which are used to define animal body of animal were used to finding broiler body weight. Therefore, were to find interaction influence between of sex and correlation between sex and additive on blood biochemistry, and gut morphometric of broiler.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 112 (Ross308) broiler with BW of 37.23± 5.33 gram set for fifth week of in vivo study. The broiler (male and females) were separated gender. The pens designed a randomized completed design. All broiler were keeping in an environmentally controlled with fan intermittent and heater.

The housing relatively temperature and humidity among 29°C and 64%, respectively. The rice hull-littered floor pens with height of 3.3 (1.7 x 1.7) m2 per pen. The lighting program was set at 23 L and 1 D).

Experimental design

Experimental design began with two treatments and four replicates as control and experimental while, sex act as an male and female. The probiotics are divided into four types (table 2).

The formulation of feedstuff consisted: maize, dehulled soya bean meal, L-lysine, DL-Methionine, Di calcium Phosphate, Premix mineral, vitamin mineral, choline, limestone, soy oil. Feed was reformulation using software.

Data analysis

The data collected and test using software SAS and differences among treatment and interaction were continuing with turkey test (p < 0.05).

Probiotic content analyses and blood measurement

The profile of probiotic (table 1) of the Probiotic enhanced liquid acidifier and Probiotic enhanced mannan rich fractions were used quantitative agar technique method (petri dish method). About (ranging from 10-3 to 10-5) and then streak onto MacConkey agar plates (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) for the enumeration of Streptococcus thermopiles. Lactobacillus, bacillus spp, bacillus subtilis, and Lactococcus sp (Medium 222; DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast using chloramphenicol medium. Finalizes, plate was incubated for 24 hours at 37°C (Gao et al., 2017). at the end of period the blood samples were collected from vein of wing and put into EDTA. Immediately centrifuged at 3000 rpm.

Table 1. Raw feed and feed formulation during time of experimental

Feed nutrient
Starter (1-21 days)
Finisher (22-35days)
Maize
56.22
68.76
Imported soya bean
36.21
26.65
Betaine
0.54
0.55
Sodium bicarbonate
1.67
1.55
Broken limestone
1.13
1.02
Salt
0.3
0.3
Palm oleate
2.81
0.06
Custom vitamin mix
0.05
0.05
Custom mineral mix
0.05
0.05
100
100
Dry matter (%)
91.05
86.22
ME (Kcal/kg)
3050
3150
Ash (%)
9.00
9.00
Crude protein (%)
21.00
18.00
Fat (%)
6.00
6.00
Crude fibre (%)
3.00
2.50

Table 2. Microbial profile of probiotics

Determination target
Cell count (cfu/ml)

Probiotic enhanced liquid Probiotic enhanced mannan

acidifier rich fractions

Lactobacillus spp Bacillus spp Lactococcus spp Bacillus subtilis S. cerevisiae
1.0 x 108 3.2 x 1010

2.6 x 105 8.1 x 106

2.5 x 109 2.3 x 107

6.5 x 1011 2.1 x 109

5.5 x 1010 1.0 x 108

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

According to the Table 3 shows that the GOT and GPT result control males broiler were 214 U/L (0.85%; GOT vs. 0.9% GPT) lower than females from the same group, whereas experimental males broiler blood biochemistry result 184 U/L (0.85%; GOT vs. 0%; GPT) more than experimental females. In both groups, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase; glutamic pyruvic transaminase; triglyceride; total cholesterol; glucose did not significant (p < 0.05) greater numerically trends in females than in males. However, the group × sex interaction was not significant (p < 0.05) for among parameter. The Glucose result were significant difference (p > 0.05)

showed in the table the positive trends result between control and experimental numerically with result in average (215.25 vs 200 mg/dL).

The result of triglyceride and total cholesterol were not significant (p < 0.05) result numerically but help to reduce the number. According to Abbas et al., (2018) stated different levels of treatment probiotics on some serum biochemistry showed serum glucose concentration and serum total protein concentration was greater significance (p <0.05) with increasing levels of probiotic supplementation in feed. Serum urea concentration and Serum creatinine concentration were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Blood serum glucose and serum total protein concentrations tended to be higher (p < 0.05) in the protexin supplemented treatments.

Additional reports from Adli and Sjofjan (2020) stated the probiotics can’t help increasing the amount of TCHOL, BUN, GLC due the consistencies of probiotic secreted the acid. Based on the experimental used the natural resources to increase the nutritive value of the feed e.g. Lactobacillus, Bifid bacterium, Bacillus sp., Streptococcus, yeast, and Saccharomyces cereviciae and metabolite as basic to produce the probiotic. The total bacteria that can providing the immunity balance are 3.2 x 1010 CFU/g, in otherwise Lactobacillus are probiotics that can survive in the acid condition, intestinal due to function of Lactobacillus to covered the mucosa and produce the pathogen anti­microbes (Wang et al., 2018).

Table 3. Selected blood biochemistry of broiler in 35-day-old

Group Sex (n=56) GOT (U/L) GPT (U/L) TCHOL (mg/dL) TGL (mg/dL) GLC (mg/dL)
Control Male 214 2.25a 154.00 86.25 215.25b
Female 251.25b 2.50 148.00 170.25 247.25ab
Avg 232.62 2.37 151.00 128.25 231.25ab*
Experimental Male 184 1.75ab 138.75 93.00 200.00b
Female 214.25b 1.75 129.75 198.25 229.75b
Avg 199.12 1.75 134.25 145.62 249.75b*
Pooled SE 23.57 0.61 11.15 41.67 0.64
Group 0.212 0.444 0.22 0.123 0.23
Sex 0.34 0.233 0.33 0.234 0.111
Group x sex 0.221 0.111 0.22 0.212 <0.001
GOT: glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase; GPT: glutamic pyruvic transaminase; TGL:

triglyceride; TCHOL: total cholesterol; GLC: glucose a-b Means within row followed by different superscript differ at p<0.05

Table 4. Gut morphometric of broiler in 35-day-old

Group
Sex (n=56)
Villus height (μm)
Crypt depth (μm)
VH/CD Ratio
Control
Male
537.50b
117.00
4.75
Female
686.75a
113.00
5.86
Avg
612.12
115.00
5.30
Experimental
Male
753.50a
107.25
7.02
Female
646.75ab
99.50
6.50
Avg
700.12a*
103.37
6.76
Pooled SE
67.44
41.70
1.60
Group
0.222
0.445
0.866
Sex
0.123
0.233
0.912
Group x sex
0.331
0.123
0.638

a-b Means within row followed by different superscript differ at p<0.05

According to the Table 4 shows that result of the gut morphometric of the control male’s broiler were 537.50 μm (0.78%) lower than females from the same group, whereas experimental male’s broiler weighed 700.12 μm (1.16%) more than experimental females and give significant difference (p > 0.05). The group × sex interactions for villus height, crypt depth, and VH/CD ratio were no significant difference (p < 0.05) (Table 6).

The data listed in Table 6 showed that the use of two kind probiotic did not have a significant effect (p < 0.05) on crypt depth and VH/CDratio. In both groups, crypt depth and VH/CD ratio were did not significant (p < 0.05) greater numerically trends in males than in females. However, the group × sex interaction was not significant for the above parameter. In the experiment, the gut morphometric were average increase rather than crypth depth and VH/CD ratio.

The genes may correlation with the sex in this experimental. In addition, the brush border were potential reason increased the gut morphometric area of broiler since it separated between sex and probiotic. Compared with Porter et al., (2010) no interaction between sexes for growth performance. At the end the result of this experimental of Goo et al., (2019) also similar both male were heavier than female’s body weight (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

To sum up, the interaction between group × sex was significant for body weight (g) broiler and non-linear models were effective to comparison between in vivo and predicted models.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The research belongs tocorresponding itself. There were not specific helps funds from government, commercial, nor either profitable organizations.

REFERRENCE

Adli, D. N., Chi, Y., Lee, J. W., & Sjofjan, O. (2019). Supplementation mannan- rich fraction (MRF) and/or combination with probiotic-enhanced water acidifier on dietary female broiler at 28 days as natural growth promoters (NGPs). International Research Journal of Advanced Engineering and Sci, 4(3), 427-429.

Adli, D. N., & Sjofjan, O. (2020a). Growth performance, serum bloodbiochemistry, and intestinal

properties of Arbor Acres Broiler fed diets containing mannan-riched fraction (MRF) and probiotic- enhanced liquid acidifier. Buletin Peternakan, 44(2), 97-105. https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44 i2.54713

Adli, D. N., & Sjofjan, O. (2020b). Meta- analisis: pengaruh substitusi jagung dengan bahan pakal lokal terhadap kualitas karkas daging broiler. Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan Terapan, 3(2), 44­48. https://doi.org/10.25047/jipt.v3i2. 1940

Adli, D. N., Sjofjan, O., & Mashudi, M. (2018). A study: nutrient content evaluation of dried poultry waste urea molasses block (dpw-umb) on proximate analysis. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan, 28(1), 84-89. https://doi. org/10.21776/ub.jiip.2018.028.01.09

Adli, D. N., Sjofjan, O., Natsir, M. H., Nuningtyas, Y. F., Sholikah, N., & Marbun, A. C. (2020). The effect of replacing maize with fermented palm kernel meal (fpkm) on broiler performance. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 32(7), 1-7.

Agustiningsih, D. (2002). Pengaruh Penggunaan Know, Dui Kitrucr Fermentasi Dengan Inokulum Tempe Dan Oncom Dalam Ransum Terhadap Performans Ayam Pedaging Performans Avam Pedaging. Universitas Diponegoro.

An, B. K., Cho, B. L., You, S. J., Paik, H. D., Chang, H. I., Kim, S. W., Yun, C. W., & Kang, C. W. (2008). Growth performance and antibody response of broiler chicks fed yeast derived β- glucan and single-strain probiotics. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 21(7), 1027-1032. https:// doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70571

Masoudi, A. (2017). Comparison of nonlinear models describing growth curves of broiler chickens fed on different levels of corn bran. International International Journal of Avian & Wildlife Biology, 2(2), 1-7.

https://doi.org/10.15406/ijawb.2017.0 2.00012

Porter, T., Kebreab, E., Darmani Kuhi, H., Lopez, S., Strathe, A. B., & France, J. (2010). Flexible alternatives to the Gompertz equation for describing growth with age in turkey hens. Poultry Science, 89(2), 371-378. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00141

Wang, Y., Dong, Z., Song, D., Zhou, H., Wang, W., Miao, H., Wang, L., & Li, A. (2018). Effects of microencapsulated probiotics and prebiotics on growth performance, antioxidative abilities, immune functions, and caecal microflora in broiler chickens. Food and Agricultural Immunology, 29(1), 859-869. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540 105.2018.1463972 Gallusia Marhaeny Nur Isty, Dkk 2022

 

Last Updated on 6 September 2022

Total
0
Shares
Tinggalkan Balasan

Alamat email Anda tidak akan dipublikasikan. Ruas yang wajib ditandai *

Situs ini menggunakan Akismet untuk mengurangi spam. Pelajari bagaimana data komentar Anda diproses.

Previous Post
notaris

Kewenangan Notaris dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Tanah dan Bangunan: Studi Kasus Penahanan Sertipikat Hak Guna Bangunan

Next Post
Centrosema Pubescens

Pematahan proses dormansi benih tanaman centro (Centrosema Pubescens) dengan penggunaan PEG (Polyeth-Ylene Glycol) 6000

Related Posts