Authority of a Notary Related to Marriage Agreements After the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015
on
Authors:
Ida Bagus Kade Wahyu Sudhyatmika, I Nyoman Bagiastra
Abstract:
“The purpose of this study is to analyze the arrangements related to marriage agreements in Indonesia and examine the authority possessed by notary related to marriage agreements after the Constitutional Court Decision. This paper is a normative legal research method since the focus of the study departs from the vagueness of norms by using several approaches: statute approach, conceptual approach, and analytical approach. The results of the study indicated that arrangements related to marriage agreements are subject to the provisions of the Marriage Law and the Civil Code. Referring to the provisions in Article 29 of the Marriage Law, it is understood that at or before the marriage takes place both parties with mutual consent can enter into a written agreement ratified by the civil registration officer, after the contents also apply to third parties. Furthermore, there has been a change in the authority of the Notary after the Constitutional Court’s Decision, however, until now the Notary has not been able to ratify the marriage agreement as referred to in the Constitutional Court’s Decision. For that we need a new mechanism that can be regulated in implementing regulations related to the authority of a Notary to ratify a marriage agreement, which the result that the ratification of a marriage agreement made by anNotary can be accessed by the public and can provide legal certainty for the parties involved in the marriage agreement, including third parties and also notaries who ratify.”
Keywords
Keyword Not Available
Downloads:
Download data is not yet available.
References
References Not Available
PDF:
https://jurnal.harianregional.com/akuntansi/full-91882
Published
2022-12-21
How To Cite
WAHYU SUDHYATMIKA, Ida Bagus Kade; BAGIASTRA, I Nyoman. Authority of a Notary Related to Marriage Agreements After the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015.Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), [S.l.], v. 11, n. 4, p. 758-771, dec. 2022. ISSN 2502-3101. Available at: https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/jmhu/article/view/91882. Date accessed: 08 Jul. 2024.
Citation Format
ABNT, APA, BibTeX, CBE, EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows), MLA, ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows), RefWorks, Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only), Turabian
Issue
Vol 11 No 4 (2022)
Section
Articles
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Discussion and feedback