Authors:

Theodorus Hendrik Willem Lumunon, Liju Zet Viany, Butje Tampi, Caecelia J. J. Waha

Abstract:

“The prevailing law of the hospital liability for every damage occured by the health professionals in hospital falls into very broad sense and leaving many critical questions about how this definition to be applied. The question addressed whether the hospital may defend it’s position by proving that the negligence by the health professionals was caused beyond the hospital guidelines such as the theory of professional liability scheme?. Purpose: to explain the hospital liability based on the corporate negligence theory, and to identify the implementation of economic credential in private hospitals. Method: using the normative juridical method, through legislation approach, concepts and legal comparison and also supported by the data field such focus group discussion. Results: Health professionals can be liabiled if she/he has found deviate by the professional medical standards.The hospital was liabiled for every damage occured by the health professional based on the “vicarious liability” scheme. The medical negligence according to the perception of health law is different from the general negligence in the legal perception. The economic credentialing actually has exist with some modification such as “scheme target”, or what we called the “quasi economic credentialing”. Rumah Sakit bertanggung gugat terhadap kerugian yang diakibatkan oleh tenaga kesehatan yang bekerja di rumah sakit. Konsep ini menimbulkan pertanyaan mengenai beban pembuktian apakah pihak rumah sakit dapat mengelak dengan argumen bahwa kelalaian tenaga kesehatan itu sudah bertindak di luar skema tanggung jawab rumah sakit sebagaimana umumnya berlaku pada teori pertanggungjawaban. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan tanggung gugat rumah sakit berdasarkan teori corporate negligence, dan mengidentifikasi bagaimana pelaksanaan economic credentialing di rumah sakit swasta. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, dengan pendekatan, perundang-undangan, konsep dan perbandingan hukum, dan data lapangan sebagai penunjang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan staf medis dapat di mintakan tanggung gugat apabila menyimpang dari standar profesi kedokteran. Rumah Sakit, sebagai majikan dapat dimintakan tanggung gugat atas kerugian yang dilakukan tenaga kesehatan yang bekerja di rumah sakit sebagaimana skema pertanggungan jawab vicarious liability. Kelalaian medis menurut persepsi hukum kesehatan berbeda dengan kelalaian umum persepsi hukum. Kredensial ekonomi di rumah sakit tertentu telah dilaksanakan, meskipun dalam pengertian terbatas, disebut peneliti target skema (quasi economic credentialing).”

Keywords

Keyword Not Available

Downloads:

Download data is not yet available.

References

References Not Available

PDF:

https://jurnal.harianregional.com/akuntansi/full-52960

Published

2020-05-31

How To Cite

WILLEM LUMUNON, Theodorus Hendrik et al. Implementasi dari Corporate Negligence dan Relevansi Quasi Economic Credentialing dalam Praktik di Rumah Sakit Swasta.Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), [S.l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 182-194, may 2020. ISSN 2502-3101. Available at: https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/jmhu/article/view/52960. Date accessed: 28 Aug. 2025. doi:https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i01.p13.

Citation Format

ABNT, APA, BibTeX, CBE, EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows), MLA, ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows), RefWorks, Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only), Turabian

Issue

Vol 9 No 1 (2020)

Section

Articles

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License